Semantika ja analüütiline filosoofia: erinevus redaktsioonide vahel

Allikas: Lambda
Mine navigeerimisribale Mine otsikasti
439. rida: 439. rida:
= Some themes for selection =
= Some themes for selection =


Ideas for the first rounds [https://www.raamatukoi.ee/cgi-bin/raamat?1503 from this book] (search originals from the web):


* Putnam: tähendus ja osutus. (Meaning and reference) 
* Quine: empirismi kaks dogmat.  (Two dogmas of empiricism)
* Dummett: Truth.
* Tarski: semantiline tõekontseptsioon. 
* Strawson: tähendus ja tõde
* Ramsey subjektiivne tõenäosusteooria.


Further:
 
 
* Analytic / synthetic vs apriori / aposteriori (Kant etc)
 
* Frege: Frege tähendusest ja osutusest.
Classical analytic philosophy
* Dennett: kvaalide kvainimine (quining qualia).
 
* Paul Grice: "meaning" and overview of other important parts of Grice claims and theory.
* Kant's [https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/kant-judgment/ theory of judgement].
* Nick Boström "are we living in simulation".  http://www.simulation-argument.com/ and http://www.nickbostrom.com/
* Wittgenstein's Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus vs Philosophical Investigations. Also: background and influences (like, for PI pragmatism via Ramsey). Tanel has done a very brief intro to the topic, so we can continue from there. I.e recall Tractatus, but do not spend much time there, assuming we have already looked into this. Spend more time on PI and especially the comparison between the Tractatus phase (early Wittgenstein) and PI phase (late Wittgenstein). This is a popular topic, easy to google.
* Evolution of morals. [http://www.spiegel.de/international/spiegel/spiegel-interview-with-edward-wilson-on-the-formation-of-morals-a-884767.html alusta siit] ja otsi ise edasi.  
* Putnam: tähendus ja osutus. [https://danielwharris.com/teaching/364online/weeks/3/Putnam.pdf Meaning and reference]. Lisaks tasub vaadata [https://faculty.washington.edu/smcohen/453/PutnamDisplay.pdf ülevaadet]. Vaata ka  [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_constructionism Social_constructionism wikis] ja ntx [https://www.jstor.org/stable/2654557?seq=4 siin] ja taustaks kindlasti [https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/functionalism/ Functionalism (SEP)], [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Functionalism_(philosophy_of_mind) Functionalism (wiki)]: Googelda artiklile juurde seletusi/analüüse.
* Quine: empirismi kaks dogmat. Linke: [https://www.theologie.uzh.ch/dam/jcr:ffffffff-fbd6-1538-0000-000070cf64bc/Quine51.pdf siin], [https://sidoli.w.waseda.jp/Quine_Two_Dogmas.pdf siin]. Vt ka [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two_Dogmas_of_Empiricism taust/analüüs wikis].  
* Chomsky keeleteooria põhipunktid
* Frege: Frege tähendusest ja osutusest. Read [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sense_and_reference an overview/background from wikipedia] and Frege's own paper [https://www.jstor.org/stable/2181485 On Sense and Reference]. There is a [https://youtu.be/sDlFaOn71n8?si=dlhk_xJodh8vYnFz youtube video] about the paper. See SEP [https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/frege/ on Frege], [https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/frege-logic/ Frege's logic] and wikipedia about [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Begriffsschrift  Begriffsschrift] (the book inventing predicate calculus).
* Mirror Neurons mh alustuseks brain science podcast 35 Mirror Neurons ja podcast 39 (Discusses the role of mirror neurons in imitation and language) pluss googelda veidi juurde.  
* Tarski: semantiline tõekontseptsioon. [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alfred_Tarski About Tarski]. The [https://sites.ualberta.ca/~francisp/Phil426/TarskiTruth1944.pdf original paper] and [https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/tarski-truth/ the SEP explanations/details/background]
* Frame problem in AI. Start with http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frame_problem and continue to find additional materials and examples.  
* Strawson: tähendus ja tõde (meaning and truth). One [https://www.scribd.com/doc/101020068/Strawson-Meaning-and-Truth fulltext here]. Look at SEP about [https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/strawson/ Strawson]. There is a Robinson's podcast [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1XJ5k4GY83E video episode about the Strawson approach (at ca 1:21)] and another podcast [https://partiallyexaminedlife.com/2018/07/23/ep195-1-austin-strawson/ episode] about the context of Strawson/Austin debate on theme.  
* How do bacteria and simple organisms communicate. Start with [http://www.ted.com/talks/bonnie_bassler_on_how_bacteria_communicate this TED lecture].  
* Dennett: kvaalide kvainimine (quining qualia). Full text [https://web-archive.southampton.ac.uk/cogprints.org/254/ here]. About the views of Dennett [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/316513753_Illusionism_as_the_obvious_default_theory_of_consciousness by himself] and [https://www.thenewatlantis.com/publications/the-illusionist others]. Some [https://www.reddit.com/r/askphilosophy/comments/izbzhd/why_does_daniel_dennett_in_quining_qualia_assert/ discussion on reddit]. Wikipedia about [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qualia qualia].
* infinity: cardinals and ordinals.
* [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Dummett Dummett]: Truth. One fulltext [https://www.andrew.cmu.edu/user/kk3n/epistclass/dummett.pdf here]. You may also want to read comments like [https://askaphilosopher.org/2017/03/04/michael-dummetts-truth/ this] and background like [https://iep.utm.edu/scientific-realism-antirealism/ this]
* Overview of pragmatism as a philosophical school: main ideas, development etc.
* Pragmatism. Start with [https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/pragmatism/ the SEP article] and search for more.
* example of a proof which is classically easy but intuitionistically hard: irrationality around square root of two.  
* Paul Grice: "meaning" and overview of other important parts of Grice claims and theory. This is also so widely discussed that it is easy to google. Start with [https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/grice/ SEP]. Some nice intros to implicatures: [https://www.bu.edu/linguistics/UG/course/lx502/_docs/lx502-implicatures.pdf here] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Implicature this wikipage]. [https://www.ucl.ac.uk/ls/studypacks/Grice-Logic.pdf Grice himself about this stuff]. [http://lingphil.mit.edu/papers/fox/class_1.pdf More detailed] stuff. Check also [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relevance_theory the relevance theory]. Certainly look through a very nice [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CGJGIWqnSFY video] about flouting/violating the maxims in relation to irony, sarcasm and jokes.
* [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthropic_principle Anthropic principle] and the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boltzmann_brain Boltzmann brain].
 
* modal logics S4 ja S5 and possible worlds (Kripke semantics).  
Brain science and evolution
* neurons.
 
* Research and give an overview of the state of the art in machine translation: top systems, their capacity and the main principles of how they work.
* Statistical principles in machine translation a la Google
* Confirmation bias, start with [http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg21428661.200-the-argumentative-ape-why-were-wired-to-persuade.html?full=true this article]  
* How do bacteria and simple organisms communicate. Start with [http://www.ted.com/talks/bonnie_bassler_on_how_bacteria_communicate this TED lecture]  
* Evolution of morals. [http://www.spiegel.de/international/spiegel/spiegel-interview-with-edward-wilson-on-the-formation-of-morals-a-884767.html alusta siit]  
* How do bacteria and simple organisms communicate. Start with [http://www.ted.com/talks/bonnie_bassler_on_how_bacteria_communicate this TED lecture]  
* Frame problem in AI. Start with http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frame_problem and continue to find additional materials and examples.  
* Intuitsionistlik loogika: näited teoreemidest, mis kehtivad klassikaliselt, kuid mitte intuitsionistlikult. Näiteid tõestustest, millel lihtne klassikaline, kuid keeruline intuitsionistlik tõestus.  
* Ordinaalid ja kardinaalid.  
* Neuroimaging, auditory hallucinations, and the bicameral mind.pdf [http://www.reddit.com/r/Neuropsychology/comments/myznt/neuroimaging_auditory_hallucinations_and_the/ start here and download pdf]
* Neurons are more complex than we thought, see [https://www.quantamagazine.org/neural-dendrites-reveal-their-computational-power-20200114/ here] and [https://medium.com/intuitionmachine/neurons-are-more-complex-than-what-we-have-imagined-b3dd00a1dcd3 here] for starters.
* Neurons are more complex than we thought, see [https://www.quantamagazine.org/neural-dendrites-reveal-their-computational-power-20200114/ here] and [https://medium.com/intuitionmachine/neurons-are-more-complex-than-what-we-have-imagined-b3dd00a1dcd3 here] for starters.
* [https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005268 Could a Neuroscientist Understand a Microprocessor?]
* [https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005268 Could a Neuroscientist Understand a Microprocessor?]
* [https://qualiacomputing.com/2016/12/12/the-hyperbolic-geometry-of-dmt-experiences/ The Hyperbolic Geometry of DMT Experiences] and see [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lyu7v7nWzfo this] for some background.
* Karl Friston and the free energy principle . A useful[https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2020/03/09/87-karl-friston-on-brains-predictions-and-free-energy/ podcast episode] and the [https://www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/~karl/ homepage].
* [https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11245-017-9460-1 Perception Without Representation]
* Antonio Damasio and the origin of important stuff in homeostasis. [https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2019/04/29/episode-44-antonio-damasio-on-feelings-thoughts-and-the-evolution-of-humanity/ Interview] and a [https://www.ted.com/speakers/antonio_damasio ted talk]. See also https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Somatic_marker_hypothesis
* [https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnsys.2016.00095/full Brain Computation Is Organized via Power-of-Two-Based Permutation Logic]
* Donald D. Hoffman and the user interface (MUI) theory of mind. Easy to google, highly popular.
* Main points from Clark in the [https://samharris.org/episode/SEF4786499D Andy Clark] episode (predictive brain, embodied cognition, and the extended mind) full version from the [https://www.samharris.org/podcasts/making-sense-episodes Making sense] podcast by Sam Harris. If the full version link does not work for some reason, check out the shorter version [https://www.samharris.org/podcasts/making-sense-episodes/322-predicting-reality here] and ask Tanel for help. You may also want to google papers by Andy Clark and/or select for reading some papers from the [https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=JLYTMxgAAAAJ&hl=en&oi=ao scholar site] or [https://profiles.sussex.ac.uk/p493-andy-clark/publications his own site].
* Randy Gallistel on memory [https://braininspired.co/podcast/126/ interview 1] and maybe also [https://codykommers.substack.com/p/79-randy-gallistel#details interview 2]. Some additional background: [https://www.lifeiscomputation.com/the-truth-about-the-not-so-universal-approximation-theorem/ here]
* Confirmation bias, start with [https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg21428661-200-the-argumentative-ape-why-were-wired-to-persuade/ this article] and search for more. Vaata lisaks [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confirmation_bias wikist].
* Mike Frank: Early Language and Cognition. [https://braininspired.co/podcast/171/ Interview] and perhaps a longer [https://langcog.stanford.edu/papers_new/goodman-2016-tics.pdf paper 1] and [https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/yhrb4 paper 2]
* Evolution of morals. alusta [http://www.spiegel.de/international/spiegel/spiegel-interview-with-edward-wilson-on-the-formation-of-morals-a-884767.html siit] ja otsi ise edasi. Vaata ka [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution_of_morality wiki põhiartiklit] ja [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Altruism_(biology) lähedalt seotud altruismi teemat]. Important background is [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sociobiology sociobiology] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolutionary_psychology evolutionary psychology].
* Anil Seth on consciousness.  A useful [https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2021/10/11/168-anil-seth-on-emergence-information-and-consciousness/ podcast episode] and a [https://www.anilseth.com/ homepage].
* Symbolic_interactionism https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
* Main points of Chomsky's theories of language. This is so widely discussed that it is easy to google. You may want to listen to some podcasts with Chomsky himself: for example, [https://podbay.fm/p/robinsons-podcast/e/1679583620 this] and [https://lexfridman.com/noam-chomsky this]. Certainly read about criticism. You may want to listen to [https://lexfridman.com/edward-gibson this episode] with a critical analysis of Chomsky.
* How do bacteria and simple organisms communicate. Start with this [https://www.ted.com/talks/bonnie_bassler_how_bacteria_talk?subtitle=en TED talk] and search for more. For example, [https://www.jstor.org/stable/24993610?seq=1 a SciAm article], [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/7275189_Keller_L_Surette_MG_Communication_in_bacteria_an_ecological_and_evolutionary_perspective_Nat_Rev_Microbiol_4_249-258 this] is an in-depth paper, [https://kids.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frym.2019.00001 this] handles bacteria working through insects.
* Neuroimaging, auditory hallucinations, and the bicameral mind.pdf [http://www.reddit.com/r/Neuropsychology/comments/myznt/neuroimaging_auditory_hallucinations_and_the/ start here and download pdf]
* Mirror Neurons
 
Philosophy of math
 
* Intuitsionistlik loogika: näited teoreemidest, mis kehtivad klassikaliselt, kuid mitte intuitsionistlikult. Näiteid tõestustest, millel lihtne klassikaline, kuid keeruline intuitsionistlik tõestus (standardnäide: ruutjuur kahest on irratsionaalne, vt näiteks [https://www.mathsisfun.com/numbers/square-root-2-irrational.html siit] ja googelda juurde). Vaata intuitsionisliku loogika kohta [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intuitionistic_logic wikist] ja [https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/logic-intuitionistic/ SEPist]. NB! Intuitsionistlik loogika on oluline teema matemaatika filosoofias: Tanel teeb sellele hilisemates loengutes eraldi sissejuhatuse.
* Infinity: Ordinaalid ja kardinaalid. Maybe start with a good exposition at [https://philosophy.stackexchange.com/questions/6352/what-is-the-difference-between-an-ordinal-number-and-a-cardinal-number  in this discussion]. Continue with [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cardinality cardinals] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ordinal_number ordinals] in wiki, check out [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russell%27s_paradox Russell's paradox], read about [https://people.maths.ox.ac.uk/knight/lectures/ordinals.pdf transfinite ordinals]
* Kripke semantics of modal logics. Also, check out the relevant materials from the section "Infinity, logic and philosophy of mathematics" above.
 
Specifically A.I.: in a narrow sense
 
* Frame problem. Good stuff to read, maybe in that order [https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/frame-problem/ SEP], [https://folk.idi.ntnu.no/gamback/teaching/TDT4138/dennett84.pdf Dennett], [https://people.cs.pitt.edu/~milos/courses/cs2740/Lectures/class14.pdf Blocks world example], [http://www-formal.stanford.edu/leora/fp.pdf Morgenstern]. Beware that none of the various "solutions" are not really satisfactory: they should be considered as possible approaches, not solutions.
* About the paper "Computational irreducibility and compatibilism: towards a formalization". Free will issues connected to computation.
* Statistical machine translation, incl major waves/paradigms of machine translation.
 
Complexity, probabilities, motivation, causation and friends
 
* Ramsey subjektiivne tõenäosusteooria. [http://fitelson.org/probability/ramsey.pdf Full text] of his paper. Important background: [https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/probability-interpret/ interpretations of probability], esp "The Subjective Interpretation" and [https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ramsey/#PartBeliSubjProb specifically about Ramsey's views].
* [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assembly_theory Assembly Theory]. See also [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-023-06600-9 a Nature paper]. Recommended: especially, a good [https://www.samharris.org/podcasts/making-sense-episodes/388-what-is-life discussion] with [https://www.santafe.edu/people/profile/sara-walker Sara Walker], and [https://lexfridman.com/lee-cronin-3/ another] with [https://www.santafe.edu/people/profile/leroy-lee-cronin Lee Cronin].
* Kahneman & Tversky: briefly about Prospect theory and more on System 1 and System 2 thinking
* Judea Pearl on causality. A useful [https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2022/05/09/196-judea-pearl-on-cause-and-effect/ podcast episode] and [https://lexfridman.com/judea-pearl another] and [https://www.samharris.org/podcasts/making-sense-episodes/164-cause-effect yet another] and [http://bayes.cs.ucla.edu/jp_home.html homepage].
*  David Deutsch and the probabilistic (or rather, not) nature of scientific theories. A [https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2023/10/16/253-david-deutsch-on-science-complexity-and-explanation/ useful podcast]. Also the [https://www.daviddeutsch.org.uk/papersarticles/ homepage]. Here is one [https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rspa.2014.0540 complicated paper] on constructor theory, as a potential additional deep source.
 


<!--
Various ideas about the world
== Toorik ajakavast: läheb korrigeerimisele / täpsustamisele ==


11. sept:
Andres: Putnam: tähendus ja osutus. (Meaning and reference)
Georg: Nick Boström "are we living in simulation". http://www.simulation-argument.com/ and http://www.nickbostrom.com/
Hannaliina: Quine: empirismi kaks dogmat. (Two dogmas of empiricism)
Eleriin: Confirmation bias, start with this article
18. sept
Danyil: Evolution of morals. alusta siit ja o tsi ise edasi.
Viktoria: Strawson: tähendus ja tõde
Liisi: Intuitsionistlik loogika: näited teoreemidest, mis kehtivad klassikaliselt, kuid mitte intuitsionistlikult. Näiteid tõestustest, millel lihtne klassikaline, kuid keeruline intuitsionistlik tõestus.
Raul: Dummett: Truth.
25. sept
Kauri: Ramsey subjektiivne tõenäosusteooria.
Jonatan: antroopsusprintsiip
Rannar: Dennett: kvaalide kvainimine (quining qualia).
Roman: How do bacteria and simple organisms communicate


2 okt
* [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthropic_principle antroopsusprintsiip]. See the [https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/cosmology/#AnthReasMult take by SEP]. A good listen by a theoretical physicist [https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/tag/anthropic-principle/ is here]. You may want to have a look at the [https://anthropic-principle.com/anthropic-bias/ book] by Nick Boström, the classic [https://sseh.uchicago.edu/doc/Carter_Phil_Trans_1983.pdf full paper] by Brandon Carter, and [https://alta3b.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/The-Anthropic-Cosmological-Principle-John-Barrow.pdf the full book] by Barrow and Tipler. Related tidbit: there is a very early paper about the [https://www.digar.ee/arhiiv/nlib-digar:101387 anthropic principle in microcosmos] by Tanel, closely related to [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boltzmann_brain Boltzmann brain].
Marek: Frege: Frege tähendusest ja osutusest.
* Nick Boström [https://simulation-argument.com/ Are we living in simulation]. Vt taustaks [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nick_Bostrom Nick Boström (wiki)] ja [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simulation_hypothesis taust/analüüs wikis]. Googelda juurde veel analüüse/arvamusi/vastuväiteid.
Mihkel: pragmatism
* David Krakauer about complex systems. See https://davidckrakauer.com/ and listen to https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2023/07/10/242-david-krakauer-on-complexity-agency-and-information/
Epp: Tarski: semantiline tõekontseptsioon.
* panpsychism and Philip Goff. A useful [https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2019/11/04/71-philip-goff-on-consciousness-everywhere/ podcast episode]. Also, have a quick intro look into the "hard problem of consciousness" of Chalmers.
Hanna: solipsism
* Max Tegmark and the mathematical multiverse. A useful [https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2019/12/02/75-max-tegmark-on-reality-simulation-and-the-multiverse/ podcast episode].
9 okt
* Wolfram's theory of the world, using hypergraphs. A useful [https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2021/07/12/155-stephen-wolfram-on-computation-hypergraphs-and-fundamental-physics/ podcast] and [https://writings.stephenwolfram.com/2023/10/how-to-think-computationally-about-ai-the-universe-and-everything/ ted talk] and [https://writings.stephenwolfram.com/2020/04/finally-we-may-have-a-path-to-the-fundamental-theory-of-physics-and-its-beautiful/ some earlier writings]
Anzelika: infinity: Ordinaalid ja kardinaalid
* Solipsism. Certainly consider several types of solipsism, starting from [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solipsism wiki]. See also [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Methodological_solipsism methodological solipsism] and [https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/methodological-individualism/ methodological individualism] in contrast to [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Externalism externalism] of Putnam etc
-->

Redaktsioon: 3. september 2025, kell 20:32

märgid
märgid

Code: ITV9070
Link: http://lambda.ee/wiki/Semantika_ja_anal%C3%BC%C3%BCtiline_filosoofia
Title: Semantics and Analytical Philosophy Archive: year 2024 archive
Lecturer: Tanel Tammet
Contact: tanel.tammet@ttu.ee, 6203457, ICT 426

"A sign is anything that can be used to tell a lie." --Umberto Eco

“I’m writing a book on magic,” I explain, and I’m asked, “Real magic?” By real magic people mean miracles, thaumaturgical acts, and supernatural powers. “No,” I answer: “Conjuring tricks, not real magic.” Real magic, in other words, refers to the magic that is not real, while the magic that is real, that can actually be done, is not real magic. --Lee Siegel

Recordings

Several recordings will be available, but we do not plan to record most lectures/seminars.


Time, place, credits

Time: Every Friday 13:00 - 15:15

Normally we will have student presentations during the lecture time, along with planning following presentations and brief intros by the lecturer. Location:

  • Normally: SOC-314
  • Sometimes: telco over teams (these will be announced a week earlier)

Credits: 6

The lectures will be in English, unless everybody understands Estonian, in which case they will be in Estonian.

The presentations in practice sessions can be given in English or Estonian, as you prefer.

The contents of practice sessions are presentations by students and their discussion. For all students, presence in the practice sessions is important and is accounted for in the final grade.

We will probably succeed with saving the videos of lectures: will check out during the first weeks.

The course will finish with a written exam. The materials below marked with a red E will be critical for studying for the exam, while the materials marked with blue L are also used but less important. Materials without such marks will not be used for the exam questions.

In order to be allowed to take the exam,

  • each Ph.D student should give at least four presentations.
  • each master student should give at least two presentations. In case it turns out we will have enough time, an additional third short presentation might be asked for.

Presentations are not graded, but when they are determined not to be satfisfactory, they should be re-done.

The lecture times will be used for both

  • Short intros to thematic blocks by Tanel
  • Student presentations

NB! Presence at student presentations will be registered: failing to participate at many presentations will have a negative effect on the final grade.

Initial course plan, materials and topics

We consider several topics in the philosophy of language and mind, starting from general and classical ones and moving to more specific and modern.

The main goal of the lectures is to make it easier to understand the concepts and ideas in the topics, in order to better understand the reading materials.

Intro, semiotics and classical analytic philosophy

Main materials:

Useful to read/listen:

About the alphabet:


Notes on structuralism, deconstruction and friends:

Notes on Propp:

Notes on the Vienna circle and logical positivism:

Evolution of brain, intelligence and society

Sociobiology, evolutionary psychology and memetics.

Main material:

Recommended overviews:

Recommended books:

Important papers:

Additional notes and recommendations, not obligatory:

Brain science

Intro material

For exam:

Good general overviews:

Important podcasts:


General notes:

Read also:

Infinity, logic and philosophy of mathematics

The first topic is intro to the philosophy of mathematics, mainly the questions of infinity and unsolvability.

Materials to read:

Videos have heads down:

More about infinity and computability:

Helpful read: cardinality wikipedias. Read more about Gödel's incompleteness theorem from SEP: a part of a larger incompleteness-article.

A longer story about the philosophy of mathematics from SEP.

Nonclassical logics, related to the philosophy of mathematics:


More on nonclassical logics:

Thinking and AI

Notes for the overview talk

Classic ideas about the main questions of AI philosophy (close to the questions about functionalism):

First, a somewhat old interview with a classic:

Read the wiki pages of main issues:

Technical stuff from Graziano about neuroscience related to consciousness:

Detailed arguments and counterarguments for the

Some good core stuff


Living classics from the lex fridman podcast:


Semantics of natural language

We will look into both

  • Vector semantics
  • Semantics based on world model

Details will be added when the block starts

Dialog, pragmatics, uncertain knowledge

The first subject is dialogue pragmatics. Several related branches (have a brief look, but no need to read deeply unless you become interested):

To start, certainly look/listen these short lectures:

In case you just want to read original Grice:

Have a look at

Additionally, nice to listen and :


The next theme is uncertain information and probabilities: how to understand, write down and make conjectures.


Read this intro: Numeric uncertainty (L as explained next):

  • Certainly up the the section "Different ways to encode confidences in logic", also looking at the wikipages pointed to
  • Briefly look into the following sections, but do not focus or spend much time on these. The Numeric uncertainty intro was originally made for this course.

Then read the first parts and have brief looks at the SEP articles:

Here are some of our papers on our system, about confidence and reasoning with exceptions.


Recommended podcasts

  • The Gradient: a good AI podcast, relatively deep, several philosophical themes / episodes. Discontinued, but archives present.
  • Brain Inspired: real neuroscience with focus on AI related themes.
  • Philosophy bites: real philosophers conveying ideas rather clearly in ca 15 minutes
  • Robinsons podcast: Really good stuff with famous philosophers and related thinkers. One example: Donald Hoffman.
  • Making sense by Sam Harris sometimes does deep interviews with philosophers, like the following highly recommended Andy Clark episode (predictive brain, embodied cognition, and the extended mind) full version. If that does not work for some reason, check out the shorter version here.
  • Highly popular Lex Fridman podcast has sometimes deep interviews with AI and comp sci peaople. Specifically about AI I'd recommend some widely different views from Francois Chollet, Yann LeCun, Gary Marcus, Demis Hassabis, Ilya Sutskever, Ben Goertzel.
  • The Mindscape podcast of an important physicist has often quite philosophically interesting or cognitive science and AI interviews. Some recommendations: Blaise Agüera y Arcas, David Krakauer, Christoph Adami, Peter Godfrey-Smith, Yejin Choi, Hugo Mercier, Andrew Pontzen.

Presentation schedule

Some themes for selection

Classical analytic philosophy

Brain science and evolution

Philosophy of math

  • Intuitsionistlik loogika: näited teoreemidest, mis kehtivad klassikaliselt, kuid mitte intuitsionistlikult. Näiteid tõestustest, millel lihtne klassikaline, kuid keeruline intuitsionistlik tõestus (standardnäide: ruutjuur kahest on irratsionaalne, vt näiteks siit ja googelda juurde). Vaata intuitsionisliku loogika kohta wikist ja SEPist. NB! Intuitsionistlik loogika on oluline teema matemaatika filosoofias: Tanel teeb sellele hilisemates loengutes eraldi sissejuhatuse.
  • Infinity: Ordinaalid ja kardinaalid. Maybe start with a good exposition at in this discussion. Continue with cardinals and ordinals in wiki, check out Russell's paradox, read about transfinite ordinals
  • Kripke semantics of modal logics. Also, check out the relevant materials from the section "Infinity, logic and philosophy of mathematics" above.

Specifically A.I.: in a narrow sense

  • Frame problem. Good stuff to read, maybe in that order SEP, Dennett, Blocks world example, Morgenstern. Beware that none of the various "solutions" are not really satisfactory: they should be considered as possible approaches, not solutions.
  • About the paper "Computational irreducibility and compatibilism: towards a formalization". Free will issues connected to computation.
  • Statistical machine translation, incl major waves/paradigms of machine translation.

Complexity, probabilities, motivation, causation and friends


Various ideas about the world