Semantika ja analüütiline filosoofia: erinevus redaktsioonide vahel

Allikas: Lambda
Mine navigeerimisribale Mine otsikasti
 
(ei näidata sama kasutaja 113 vahepealset redaktsiooni)
7. rida: 7. rida:
Code:  ITV9070<br>
Code:  ITV9070<br>
Link: http://lambda.ee/wiki/Semantika_ja_anal%C3%BC%C3%BCtiline_filosoofia<br>
Link: http://lambda.ee/wiki/Semantika_ja_anal%C3%BC%C3%BCtiline_filosoofia<br>
Title: <b>Semantics and Analytical Philosophy</b>
Title: <b>Semantics and Analytical Philosophy</b><br>
Archive: [[ITV9070_2023|year 2023 archive]]<br>
Archive: [[ITV9070_2025|year 2025 archive]]<br>
Lecturer: [http://www.facebook.com/tanel.tammet Tanel Tammet]<br>
Lecturer: [http://www.facebook.com/tanel.tammet Tanel Tammet]<br>
Contact: tanel.tammet@ttu.ee, 6203457, ICT 426<br>
Contact: tanel.tammet@ttu.ee, 6203457, ICT 426<br>
26. rida: 26. rida:




= Exam results =
== <font color="red">NB!</font> Lambda server hardware has been fixed ==


Results for the exam on the 6. January are as follows. Since the first letters of family names were unique, here will indeed be just
Last week: sometimes the page did not open, sometimes it did.  
the first letter of the family name, along with the grade: U 4, N 4, P 5, V 4, J 4, S 3, R 5.


Results for the exam on the 13. January are as follows. Since most the first letters of family names were unique, here will be just
Now the server is fixed.
the first letter of the family name (with two exceptions for M), along with the grade:  H 4, A 4, K 5, OM 5, P 3, AM 2.


= Exam times =


<!--
= <font color="red">NB!</font> The seminar on 18. September is on Teams =


Exam times and places are as follows:
Tanel travels to U.S.A. on 13. September, hence the 18. September lecture/seminar is on Teams only. See below for the teams group.
* 6. jaanuar: kell 12 ja kell 15, ruumis NRG-131, Energeetikamaja
* 13. jaanuar: kell 13 ja kell 15:30, ruumis U06A-229, Õppehoone 6a
* 21. jaanuar: kell 11 ja kell 14, ruumis U02-102, Õppehoone 2


During each exam day you may choose yourself which of the two time slots to use. The exams will take place together with the
Use the [https://teams.microsoft.com/meet/335965570900661?p=3GhUvqU8vCQGO8pYfo link to the teams meeting].
exams for "IT sissejuhatus" (this one has quite a lot of students).
-->


= Language: English and Estonian  =


[http://turing.cs.ttu.ee/~tanel.tammet/agency.html The agency questionnaire] will be up for quite some time. The intermediate
The current plan is teach the course in English in 2026, unless everybody understands Estonian.
results will be put here soon, sometimes in mid-January.


<!--
It is OK for students to give presentations, ask questions etc in Estonian as well.
The draft of the agency questionnaire is now available below.


A recommended very recent podcast episodes:
The materials / information is currently a mix of English and Estonian: we will move towards mostly English information in case we will keep English as the main language of the course.
* with [https://braininspired.co/podcast/198/ Tony Zador]: starts perhaps in a bit boring way, but gets more interesting later.
* [https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2024/11/11/295-solo-emergence-and-layers-of-reality/ Sean Carroll about emergence]


A note about [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Integrated_information_theory IIS] for the panpsychism presentation.
= Teams and Recordings =
-->


= Recordings =
Some recordings will be available, but we do not plan to record most lectures/seminars.


Several recordings are available, but we do not plan to record all the lectures/seminars.
The teams group for the course is [https://teams.cloud.microsoft/l/channel/19%3AIzu1OVQf63SOfUs5g0zLk-exFhIVEkxMxBvAZQ2tW4Y1%40thread.tacv2/General?groupId=69f16074-ac3d-432f-9681-06225bd2b68e&tenantId=3efd4d88-9b88-4fc9-b6c0-c7ca50f1db57 Semantika ja analüütiline filosoofia 2026]. In rare cases when the seminar is on teams (first case: 18. September), not in the lecture room, we will use this. Please register, the team code is: cpjionc .


* A recording of the first lecture (4. sept) is available [https://echo360.org.uk/section/812e48fa-0cfe-4101-ab25-d06b668845ac/home here] (in Estonian).
Use the [https://teams.microsoft.com/meet/335965570900661?p=3GhUvqU8vCQGO8pYfo link to the teams meeting] on 18. Sept.
* The teams recording of the [https://livettu.sharepoint.com/:v:/s/Semantikajaanaltilinefilosoofia2024/Efa1hQ7V29tIpWQRzl4zoc8BXjE3anu9BmLZZnsectz-6A?e=2r1shC&nav=eyJyZWZlcnJhbEluZm8iOnsicmVmZXJyYWxBcHAiOiJTdHJlYW1XZWJBcHAiLCJyZWZlcnJhbFZpZXciOiJTaGFyZURpYWxvZy1MaW5rIiwicmVmZXJyYWxBcHBQbGF0Zm9ybSI6IldlYiIsInJlZmVycmFsTW9kZSI6InZpZXcifX0%3D second lecture/seminar]. The telco link is inside the [https://teams.microsoft.com/l/team/19%3AtqguBYqQG09ew2fHaRNexbp9BSGl_qNixXtcV6NERgA1%40thread.tacv2/conversations?groupId=a0fabfca-f54b-492a-98e2-9e0805ae6cb5&tenantId=3efd4d88-9b88-4fc9-b6c0-c7ca50f1db57 course teams group]
* The teams recording at [https://livettu.sharepoint.com/:v:/r/sites/Semantikajaanaltilinefilosoofia2024/Shared%20Documents/General/Recordings/Meeting%20in%20_General_-20240925_114648-Meeting%20Recording%201.mp4?csf=1&web=1&e=Xmy4zi&nav=eyJyZWZlcnJhbEluZm8iOnsicmVmZXJyYWxBcHAiOiJTdHJlYW1XZWJBcHAiLCJyZWZlcnJhbFZpZXciOiJTaGFyZURpYWxvZy1MaW5rIiwicmVmZXJyYWxBcHBQbGF0Zm9ybSI6IldlYiIsInJlZmVycmFsTW9kZSI6InZpZXcifX0%3D 25. Sept is available]


= Time, place, credits =
= Time, place, credits =


Time: Every Wednesday 11:40 - 13:55
Time: Every Friday 09:30 - 11:45


Normally we will have student presentations during the lecture time, along with planning following presentations and brief intros by the lecturer. We will follow the [http://lambda.ee/wiki/Semantika_ja_anal%C3%BC%C3%BCtiline_filosoofia#Schedule schedule]
Normally we will have student presentations during the lecture time, along with planning following presentations and brief intros by the lecturer.  
Location:  


Location:
* Normally: ICT-507 A/B
* Mostly: IT College building room ICO-219
* Sometimes: teams (these will be announced a week earlier)
* Sometimes: telco over teams (these will be announced a week earlier)


Credits: 6  
Credits: 6  
92. rida: 82. rida:
less important. Materials without such marks will not be used for the exam questions.
less important. Materials without such marks will not be used for the exam questions.


In order to be allowed to take the exam,  
In order to be allowed to take the exam, the initial plan is as follows (we may need to tune it):
* each Ph.D student should give at least four presentations.  
* each Ph.D student should give at least four presentations.  
* each master student should give at least two presentations. In case it turns out we will have enough time, an additional third short presentation might be asked for as a bonus.
* each master student should give at least two presentations. In case it turns out we will have enough time, an additional third short presentation might be asked for.


Presentations are
Presentations are
104. rida: 94. rida:


NB! Presence at student presentations will be registered: failing to participate at many presentations will have a negative effect on the final grade.
NB! Presence at student presentations will be registered: failing to participate at many presentations will have a negative effect on the final grade.


= Initial course plan, materials and topics =
= Initial course plan, materials and topics =


We consider several topics, starting from general ones and moving to more specific.
We consider several topics in the wider fields of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semantics semantics] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Analytic_philosophy analytic philosophy], like [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophy_of_language philosophy of language], [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophy_of_mind mind] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophy_of_artificial_intelligence A.I.], starting from general and classical ones and moving to more specific and modern.


The main goal of the lectures is to make it easier to understand the concepts and ideas
The main goal of the lectures is to make it easier to understand the concepts and ideas in the topics, in order to better understand the reading materials.
in the topics, in order to better understand the reading materials.


== Intro, semiotics, philosophy ==
== Intro, semiotics and classical analytic philosophy ==




* Source for the first round of presentations: [https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/25130154-t-hendus-t-de-meetod Tähendus, tõde, meetod.]. Separate original articles can be found by googling.
* Source for the first round of presentations: [https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/25130154-t-hendus-t-de-meetod Tähendus, tõde, meetod.]. Separate original articles can be found by googling.


Main materials:
Core materials:


* [http://visual-memory.co.uk/daniel/Documents/S4B/ Semiotics for beginners]. first half is obligatory. <font color="red">E</font>
* [http://visual-memory.co.uk/daniel/Documents/S4B/ Semiotics for beginners]. first half is obligatory. <font color="red">E</font>
152. rida: 142. rida:


Notes on Propp:
Notes on Propp:
* [http://www.brown.edu/Courses/FR0133/Fairytale_Generator/gen.html fairytale generator]
* [http://changingminds.org/disciplines/storytelling/plots/propp/propp.htm narrateems]
* [http://changingminds.org/disciplines/storytelling/plots/propp/propp.htm narrateems]
* [http://www.google.ee/url?sa=t&source=web&cd=2&ved=0CBwQFjAB&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.dfki.de%2Fweb%2Fforschung%2Fiwi%2Fpublikationen%2FrenameFileForDownload%3Ffilename%3DLendvaietal_DH2010_final%255B1%255D.pdf%26file_id%3Duploads_640&ei=fi1STbShMs7rObX38esH&usg=AFQjCNE568lgOE28VOp7xthwfxCXOqTACA pftml]
* [http://clover.slavic.pitt.edu/sam/propp/praxis/results.html a selection of fairy tales with the pftml structure]


Notes on the Vienna circle and logical positivism:
Notes on the Vienna circle and logical positivism:
161. rida: 148. rida:
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Analytic%E2%80%93synthetic_distinction taust: analüütiline/sünteetiline, apriori/aposteriori]
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Analytic%E2%80%93synthetic_distinction taust: analüütiline/sünteetiline, apriori/aposteriori]
* [[Klassikaline positivism kui taust|classical positivism as the background]]: [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Positivism more here]
* [[Klassikaline positivism kui taust|classical positivism as the background]]: [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Positivism more here]
* [http://philosophyfaculty.ucsd.edu/faculty/wuthrich/teaching/2008_145/Lecture04.pdf a small lecture about the Vienna cicle]
* [http://www.murzim.net/VC/VC00.html Vienna circle: good short overview] ja [http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/vienna-circle/ a longish paper from the Stanfordi encyclopedia of philosohy] and [https://sites.pitt.edu/~jdnorton/teaching/Phil_Sci_Core/Phil_Sci_Core_2022/docs/Vienna_Circle_manifesto_JDN.pdf Vienna circle manifesto]
* [http://www.murzim.net/VC/VC00.html Vienna circle: good short overview] ja [http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/vienna-circle/ a longish paper from the Stanfordi encyclopedia of philosohy] and [http://gnadav.googlepages.com/TheScientificConceptionoftheWorldeng.doc Vienna circle manifesto]
* [http://www.murzim.net/LP/LP00.html Logical positivism: good overview]
* [http://www.murzim.net/LP/LP00.html Logical positivism: good overview]
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logical_positivism wiki logical positivism]
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logical_positivism wiki logical positivism]


== Evolution of brain, intelligence and society  ==
== Evolution of brain, intelligence and society  ==
A highly recommended book: [https://mitpressbookstore.mit.edu/book/9780063286351 A Brief History of Intelligence: Evolution, AI, and the Five Breakthroughs That Made Our Brains]


Sociobiology, evolutionary psychology and memetics.
Sociobiology, evolutionary psychology and memetics.
470. rida: 458. rida:
= Recommended podcasts =
= Recommended podcasts =


* [https://thegradientpub.substack.com/s/podcast The Gradient]: a good AI podcast, relatively deep, several philosophical themes / episodes
* [https://thegradientpub.substack.com/s/podcast The Gradient]: a good AI podcast, relatively deep, several philosophical themes / episodes. Discontinued, but archives present.
* [https://braininspired.co Brain Inspired]: real neuroscience with focus on AI related themes.
* [https://braininspired.co Brain Inspired]: real neuroscience with focus on AI related themes.
* [https://nigelwarburton.typepad.com/philosophy_bites/ Philosophy bites]: real philosophers conveying ideas rather clearly in ca 15 minutes
* [https://philosophybites.com/ Philosophy bites]: real philosophers conveying ideas rather clearly in ca 15 minutes
* [https://podbay.fm/p/robinsons-podcast/ Robinsons podcast]: Really good stuff with famous philosophers and related thinkers. One example: [https://podbay.fm/p/robinsons-podcast/e/1692547200 Donald Hoffman].
* [https://podbay.fm/p/robinsons-podcast/ Robinsons podcast]: Really good stuff with famous philosophers and related thinkers. One example: [https://podbay.fm/p/robinsons-podcast/e/1692547200 Donald Hoffman].
* [https://www.samharris.org/podcasts/making-sense-episodes Making sense] by Sam Harris sometimes does deep interviews with philosophers, like the following <b>highly recommended</b> [https://samharris.org/episode/SEF4786499D Andy Clark] episode (predictive brain, embodied cognition, and the extended mind) full version. If that does not work for some reason, check out the shorter version [https://www.samharris.org/podcasts/making-sense-episodes/322-predicting-reality here].
* [https://www.samharris.org/podcasts/making-sense-episodes Making sense] by Sam Harris sometimes does deep interviews with philosophers, like the following <b>highly recommended</b> [https://samharris.org/episode/SEF4786499D Andy Clark] episode (predictive brain, embodied cognition, and the extended mind) full version. If that does not work for some reason, check out the shorter version [https://www.samharris.org/podcasts/making-sense-episodes/322-predicting-reality here].
478. rida: 466. rida:
* The [https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/ Mindscape podcast] of an important physicist has often quite philosophically interesting or cognitive science and AI interviews. Some recommendations: Blaise Agüera y Arcas, David Krakauer, Christoph Adami, Peter Godfrey-Smith, Yejin Choi, Hugo Mercier, Andrew Pontzen.
* The [https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/ Mindscape podcast] of an important physicist has often quite philosophically interesting or cognitive science and AI interviews. Some recommendations: Blaise Agüera y Arcas, David Krakauer, Christoph Adami, Peter Godfrey-Smith, Yejin Choi, Hugo Mercier, Andrew Pontzen.


== Random extra stuff ==
= Presentation schedule =
 
Time for each seminar: 09:30 - 11:45.
 
* Until 9. October: normal-length talks, ca 25 min each.
* From 16. October: short talks, 15 min each: 10 min talk and 5 min questions.
* The seminars are overbooked, since some presenters cannot attend. If we run out of time, the remaining talks go first at the next seminar.
* If you cannot attend, write to Tanel: your talk moves to a later seminar.
* ''(P)'' marks a proposed theme. You may propose a different theme for the same date: write to Tanel.
* The links after each talk are starting points. Search for more material yourself.
 
== 18. September (done) ==
 
* '''Erik''': Putnam: meaning and reference <small>[http://web.archive.org/web/20240412001306/https://danielwharris.com/teaching/364online/weeks/3/Putnam.pdf paper], [https://faculty.washington.edu/smcohen/453/PutnamDisplay.pdf overview]</small>
* '''Bauka''': Dennett: quining qualia <small>[https://web-archive.southampton.ac.uk/cogprints.org/254/ text]</small>
* '''Juhan''': Wittgenstein: Tractatus vs Philosophical Investigations <small>[https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/5740 Tractatus], [https://sophoslogos.wordpress.com/2014/08/17/the-early-and-later-philosophy-of-wittgenstein/ early vs late]</small>
* '''Teele''': Frege: sense and reference <small>[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sense_and_reference wiki], [https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/frege/ SEP]</small>
* '''Pavel''': Pragmatism <small>[https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/pragmatism/ SEP]</small>
 
== 25. September (done) ==
 
* '''Wessel''': Quine: two dogmas of empiricism <small>[http://www.ditext.com/quine/quine.html text], [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two_Dogmas_of_Empiricism wiki]</small>
* '''Annika''': Anil Seth on consciousness <small>[https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2021/10/11/168-anil-seth-on-emergence-information-and-consciousness/ podcast]</small>
* '''Ulrik''': Tarski: the semantic conception of truth <small>[https://sites.ualberta.ca/~francisp/Phil426/TarskiTruth1944.pdf paper], [https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/tarski-truth/ SEP]</small>
* '''Huzaifa''': Homeostasis and brain science (Damasio) <small>[https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2019/04/29/episode-44-antonio-damasio-on-feelings-thoughts-and-the-evolution-of-humanity/ podcast]</small>
* '''Dmitri''': Paul Grice: meaning and implicature <small>[https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/grice/ SEP], [https://www.ucl.ac.uk/ls/studypacks/Grice-Logic.pdf Grice]</small>
 
== 2. October (done) ==
 
* '''Alex''': Philosophy of mathematics: infinity and logic <small>[[Media:infinity.pdf|notes]]</small>
* '''Kristel''': Randy Gallistel on memory <small>[https://braininspired.co/podcast/126/ podcast]</small>
* '''Erik''': How bacteria communicate <small>[https://www.ted.com/talks/bonnie_bassler_how_bacteria_talk TED]</small>
 
== 9. October ==
 
* '''Huzaifa''': Kripke: rigid designators and gender terms (first, since travelling next week) <small>[https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/rigid-designators/ SEP], [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naming_and_Necessity Naming and Necessity], [https://philarchive.org/rec/DEMRTO-2 Dembroff]</small>
* '''Hanna''': Neurons are more complex than we thought (moved from 2. Oct) <small>[https://www.quantamagazine.org/neural-dendrites-reveal-their-computational-power-20200114/ Quanta], [https://medium.com/intuitionmachine/neurons-are-more-complex-than-what-we-have-imagined-b3dd00a1dcd3 blog]</small>
* '''Parviz''': Mike Frank: early language and cognition <small>[https://braininspired.co/podcast/171/ podcast], [https://langcog.stanford.edu/papers_new/goodman-2016-tics.pdf paper 1], [https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/yhrb4 paper 2]</small>
* '''Andreas''': Donald Hoffman: the interface theory of perception <small>[https://podbay.fm/p/robinsons-podcast/e/1692547200 podcast], [https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-015-0890-8 paper]</small>
* '''Timofei''': Andy Clark: predictive brain, embodied cognition, extended mind <small>[https://samharris.org/episode/SEF4786499D podcast], [https://www.samharris.org/podcasts/making-sense-episodes/322-predicting-reality short version]</small>
* '''Henry''': Chomsky's theories of language <small>[https://podbay.fm/p/robinsons-podcast/e/1679583620 Robinson], [https://lexfridman.com/noam-chomsky Fridman], [https://lexfridman.com/edward-gibson critique]</small>
* '''Pavel''': Solipsism <small>[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solipsism wiki], [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Methodological_solipsism methodological], [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Externalism externalism]</small>


* A good [https://slate.com/technology/2023/11/openai-sam-altman-ai-microsoft-eacc-effective-altruism.html Slate article] about the background of the OpenAI soap opera.
== 16. October ==
* A famous [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slaughterbots killerbot] warning video.


* '''Roman S.''': Altruism and the evolution of morals (moved from 2. Oct) <small>[http://www.spiegel.de/international/spiegel/spiegel-interview-with-edward-wilson-on-the-formation-of-morals-a-884767.html Wilson], [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution_of_morality wiki], [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Altruism_(biology) altruism]</small>
* Drops out: '''Annabel''': Nelson Goodman <small>[https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/goodman/ SEP], [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_riddle_of_induction new riddle of induction]</small>
* '''Bauka''': Kahneman: system 1 and system 2 <small>[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thinking,_Fast_and_Slow book], [https://www.nobelprize.org/uploads/2018/06/kahnemann-lecture.pdf Nobel lecture], [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prospect_theory prospect theory]</small>
* Moved to 23 Oct: '''Hanna''': Are we living in a simulation? (Bostrom) <small>[https://simulation-argument.com/ site], [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simulation_hypothesis wiki]</small>
* '''Elina''': Neuroimaging, auditory hallucinations and the bicameral mind <small>[http://www.reddit.com/r/Neuropsychology/comments/myznt/neuroimaging_auditory_hallucinations_and_the/ reddit], [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bicameral_mentality wiki]</small>
* Moved to 23 Oct: '''Dmitri''': Confirmation bias <small>[https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg21428661-200-the-argumentative-ape-why-were-wired-to-persuade/ New Scientist], [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confirmation_bias wiki], [https://www.dan.sperber.fr/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/MercierSperberWhydohumansreason.pdf Mercier, Sperber]</small>
* Moved to 23 Oct: '''Viktoria''': Mirror neurons <small>[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mirror_neuron wiki], [https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.27.070203.144230 review], [https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2009.21189 critique]</small>
* Moved to 23 Oct:  '''Kati''': Frame problem <small>[https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/frame-problem/ SEP], [https://folk.idi.ntnu.no/gamback/teaching/TDT4138/dennett84.pdf Dennett], [http://www-formal.stanford.edu/leora/fp.pdf Morgenstern]</small>


= Presentation schedule =
== 23. October: classical philosophy and semiotics, evolution, ideas about the world ==
 
* '''Elina''': Strawson: meaning and truth (moved from 25. Sept) <small>[https://www.scribd.com/doc/101020068/Strawson-Meaning-and-Truth text], [https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/strawson/ SEP], [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1XJ5k4GY83E video]</small>
* '''Valdur''': From Propp's morphology of the folktale to Lotman's semiosphere <small>[http://changingminds.org/disciplines/storytelling/plots/propp/propp.htm Propp], [https://doi.org/10.12697/SSS.2005.33.1.09 Lotman], [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semiosphere semiosphere]</small>
* '''Denis''': Kant's theory of judgement <small>[https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/kant-judgment/ SEP], [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Analytic%E2%80%93synthetic_distinction analytic/synthetic]</small>
* '''Kalev''': Memetics <small>[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Memetics wiki], [http://www.agner.org/cultsel/toc.php Fog], [https://lexfridman.com/richard-dawkins/ Dawkins]</small>
* '''Yuliia''': Judea Pearl on causality <small>[https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2022/05/09/196-judea-pearl-on-cause-and-effect/ podcast], [https://lexfridman.com/judea-pearl Fridman], [http://bayes.cs.ucla.edu/jp_home.html homepage]</small>
* '''Eeva-Merike''': Anthropic principle <small>[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthropic_principle wiki], [https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/cosmology/#AnthReasMult SEP], [https://sseh.uchicago.edu/doc/Carter_Phil_Trans_1983.pdf Carter]</small>
* Drops out: '''Juhan''': Chalmers: the hard problem of consciousness, and could a large language model be conscious? ''(P)'' <small>[https://www.samharris.org/podcasts/making-sense-episodes/the-light-of-the-mind Harris], [https://consc.net/papers/facing.pdf hard problem], [https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.07103 LLM]</small>
* '''Dimitrios''': Panpsychism and Philip Goff ''(P)'' <small>[https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2019/11/04/71-philip-goff-on-consciousness-everywhere/ podcast], [https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/panpsychism/ SEP]</small>
 
== 30. October: logic and philosophy of mathematics ==


* 11. sept:
* '''Wessel''': Intuitionism <small>[https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/intuitionism/ SEP], [https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/logic-intuitionistic/ SEP logic], [https://www.ams.org/journals/bull/2017-54-03/S0273-0979-2016-01556-4/ Bauer]</small>
** Georg: Nick Boström [https://simulation-argument.com/ Are we living in simulation]. Vt taustaks [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nick_Bostrom Nick Boström (wiki)] ja [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simulation_hypothesis taust/analüüs wikis]. Googelda juurde veel analüüse/arvamusi/vastuväiteid.
* '''Eeva-Merike''': Intuitionistic logic: theorems and proofs that differ from classical logic ''(P)'' <small>[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intuitionistic_logic wiki], [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constructive_proof constructive proof], [https://www.mathsisfun.com/numbers/square-root-2-irrational.html sqrt 2]</small>
** Hannaliina: Quine: empirismi kaks dogmat. Linke: [https://www.theologie.uzh.ch/dam/jcr:ffffffff-fbd6-1538-0000-000070cf64bc/Quine51.pdf siin], [https://sidoli.w.waseda.jp/Quine_Two_Dogmas.pdf siin]. Vt ka [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two_Dogmas_of_Empiricism taust/analüüs wikis].
* '''Alex''': Kripke semantics of modal logics ''(P)'' <small>[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FacUHU_gjPw video 1], [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k3Jjw8oJqBk video 2], [https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/logic-modal/ SEP]</small>
** Eleriin: Confirmation bias, start with [https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg21428661-200-the-argumentative-ape-why-were-wired-to-persuade/ this article] and search for more. Vaata lisaks [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confirmation_bias wikist].
* '''Viktoria''': Russell's paradox and the foundations of mathematics ''(P)'' <small>[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russell%27s_paradox wiki], [https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/russell-paradox/ SEP], [https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/philosophy-mathematics/ SEP phil. of math]</small>
* '''Bauka''': Where does mathematics come from? Lakoff and Núñez's embodied mathematics vs Wigner's "unreasonable effectiveness" ''(P)'' <small>[[Media:Arvud_lopmatus_metafoorid.pdf|Tanel's notes (in Estonian)]], [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Where_Mathematics_Comes_From Lakoff, Núñez], [https://www.maths.ed.ac.uk/~v1ranick/papers/wigner.pdf Wigner]</small>
* '''Roman K.''': Undecidability: the halting problem and limits of computation ''(P)'' <small>[[Media:infinity.pdf|notes]], [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halting_problem wiki]</small>
* '''Ergo''': Max Tegmark and the mathematical universe ''(P)'' <small>[https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2019/12/02/75-max-tegmark-on-reality-simulation-and-the-multiverse/ podcast], [https://arxiv.org/abs/0704.0646 paper], [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mathematical_universe_hypothesis wiki]</small>


* 18. sept:  
== 6. November: brain science and evolution ==
** Andres (tõstsin üle 11. septembrilt): Putnam: tähendus ja osutus. [https://danielwharris.com/teaching/364online/weeks/3/Putnam.pdf Meaning and reference]. Lisaks tasub vaadata [https://faculty.washington.edu/smcohen/453/PutnamDisplay.pdf ülevaadet]. Vaata ka  [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_constructionism  Social_constructionism wikis] ja ntx [https://www.jstor.org/stable/2654557?seq=4 siin] ja taustaks kindlasti [https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/functionalism/ Functionalism (SEP)], [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Functionalism_(philosophy_of_mind) Functionalism (wiki)]: Googelda artiklile juurde seletusi/analüüse.
** Danyil: neurons are more complicated than we thought.
** Viktoria: Strawson: tähendus ja tõde (meaning and truth). One [https://www.scribd.com/doc/101020068/Strawson-Meaning-and-Truth fulltext here]. Look at SEP about [https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/strawson/ Strawson]. There is a Robinson's podcast [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1XJ5k4GY83E video episode about the Strawson approach (at ca 1:21)] and another podcast [https://partiallyexaminedlife.com/2018/07/23/ep195-1-austin-strawson/ episode] about the context of Strawson/Austin debate on theme.
** Liisi: Intuitsionistlik loogika: näited teoreemidest, mis kehtivad klassikaliselt, kuid mitte intuitsionistlikult. Näiteid tõestustest, millel lihtne klassikaline, kuid keeruline intuitsionistlik tõestus (standardnäide: ruutjuur kahest on irratsionaalne, vt näiteks [https://www.mathsisfun.com/numbers/square-root-2-irrational.html siit] ja googelda juurde). Vaata intuitsionisliku loogika kohta [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intuitionistic_logic wikist] ja [https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/logic-intuitionistic/ SEPist]. NB! Intuitsionistlik loogika on oluline teema matemaatika filosoofias: Tanel teeb sellele hilisemates loengutes eraldi sissejuhatuse.


* 25. sept
* '''Kristel''': Karl Friston and the free energy principle ''(P)'' <small>[https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2020/03/09/87-karl-friston-on-brains-predictions-and-free-energy/ podcast], [https://lexfridman.com/karl-friston/ Fridman], [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_energy_principle wiki]</small>
** Raul (moved here from 18. sept): [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Dummett Dummett]: Truth. One fulltext [https://www.andrew.cmu.edu/user/kk3n/epistclass/dummett.pdf here]. You may also want to read comments like [https://askaphilosopher.org/2017/03/04/michael-dummetts-truth/ this] and background like [https://iep.utm.edu/scientific-realism-antirealism/ this]
* '''Ulrik''': Global workspace theory of consciousness ''(P)'' <small>[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_workspace_theory wiki], [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2020.01.026 review]</small>
** Kauri: Ramsey subjektiivne tõenäosusteooria. [http://fitelson.org/probability/ramsey.pdf Full text] of his paper. Important background: [https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/probability-interpret/ interpretations of probability], esp "The Subjective Interpretation" and [https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ramsey/#PartBeliSubjProb specifically about Ramsey's views].
* '''Parviz''': Sociobiology and evolutionary psychology ''(P)'' <small>[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sociobiology sociobiology], [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolutionary_psychology ev. psychology], [http://web.archive.org/web/20191221070954/https://www.cep.ucsb.edu/primer.html primer]</small>
** Jonatan: [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthropic_principle antroopsusprintsiip]. See the [https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/cosmology/#AnthReasMult take by SEP]. A good listen by a theoretical physicist [https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/tag/anthropic-principle/ is here]. You may want to have a look at the [https://anthropic-principle.com/anthropic-bias/ book] by Nick Boström, the classic [https://sseh.uchicago.edu/doc/Carter_Phil_Trans_1983.pdf full paper] by Brandon Carter, and [https://alta3b.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/The-Anthropic-Cosmological-Principle-John-Barrow.pdf the full book] by Barrow and Tipler. Related tidbit: there is a very early paper about the [https://www.digar.ee/arhiiv/nlib-digar:101387 anthropic principle in microcosmos] by Tanel, closely related to [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boltzmann_brain Boltzmann brain].
* '''Teele''': Dawkins: The selfish gene ''(P)'' <small>[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Selfish_Gene wiki], [https://lexfridman.com/richard-dawkins/ Fridman]</small>
* Drops out: '''Annabel''': Dunbar: co-evolution of neocortex size, group size and language in humans ''(P)'' <small>[https://pdodds.w3.uvm.edu/files/papers/others/1993/dunbar1993a.pdf paper], [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunbar%27s_number Dunbar's number]</small>
* '''Ruslan''': Symbolic interactionism ''(P)'' <small>[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Symbolic_interactionism wiki], [https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/mead/ SEP Mead]</small>
* '''Mansoor''': Computational theory of mind ''(P)'' <small>[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computational_theory_of_mind wiki], [https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/computational-mind/ SEP]</small>
* '''Roman K.''': Metzinger: the self-model theory ''(P)'' <small>[http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Self_models Scholarpedia], [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Metzinger wiki]</small>


* 2 okt
== 13. November: thinking and AI: classic arguments ==
** Epp: Tarski: semantiline tõekontseptsioon. [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alfred_Tarski About Tarski]. The [https://sites.ualberta.ca/~francisp/Phil426/TarskiTruth1944.pdf original paper] and [https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/tarski-truth/ the SEP explanations/details/background]


* 9 okt
* '''Parviz''': Turing's "Computing machinery and intelligence" and the Turing test after LLMs ''(P)'' <small>[https://academic.oup.com/mind/article/LIX/236/433/986238 Turing], [https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/turing-test/ SEP], [https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.23674 LLMs]</small>
** Mihkel: pragmatism. Start with [https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/pragmatism/ the SEP article] and search for more.
* '''Dimitrios''': Functionalism ''(P)'' <small>[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Functionalism_(philosophy_of_mind) wiki], [https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/functionalism/ SEP]</small>
** Anzelika: infinity: Ordinaalid ja kardinaalid. Maybe start with a good exposition at [https://philosophy.stackexchange.com/questions/6352/what-is-the-difference-between-an-ordinal-number-and-a-cardinal-number  in this discussion]. Continue with [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cardinality cardinals] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ordinal_number ordinals] in wiki, check out [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russell%27s_paradox Russell's paradox], read about [https://people.maths.ox.ac.uk/knight/lectures/ordinals.pdf transfinite ordinals]
* Drops out: '''Juhan''': Searle's Chinese room ''(P)'' <small>[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_room wiki], [https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/chinese-room/ SEP]</small>
** Otto: main points of Chomsky's theories of language. This is so widely discussed that it is easy to google. You may want to listen to some podcasts with Chomsky himself: for example, [https://podbay.fm/p/robinsons-podcast/e/1679583620 this] and [https://lexfridman.com/noam-chomsky this]. Certainly read about criticism. You may want to listen to [https://lexfridman.com/edward-gibson this episode] with a critical analysis of Chomsky.
* '''Valdur''': Do LLMs have beliefs? Dennett's intentional stance vs probing models for "truth directions" ''(P)'' <small>[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intentional_stance intentional stance], [https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.18865 truth directions], [https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.06824 geometry of truth]</small>
** Enrico: Paul Grice: "meaning" and overview of other important parts of Grice claims and theory. This is also so widely discussed that it is easy to google. Start with  [https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/grice/ SEP]. Some nice intros to implicatures: [https://www.bu.edu/linguistics/UG/course/lx502/_docs/lx502-implicatures.pdf here] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Implicature this wikipage]. [https://www.ucl.ac.uk/ls/studypacks/Grice-Logic.pdf Grice himself about this stuff]. [http://lingphil.mit.edu/papers/fox/class_1.pdf More detailed] stuff. Check also [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relevance_theory the relevance theory]. Certainly look through a very nice [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CGJGIWqnSFY video] about flouting/violating the maxims in relation to irony, sarcasm and jokes.
* '''Timofei''': Hubert Dreyfus: what computers can't do ''(P)'' <small>[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hubert_Dreyfus%27s_views_on_artificial_intelligence wiki], [http://leidlmair.at/doc/WhyHeideggerianAIFailed.pdf Dreyfus 2007]</small>
<!--
* '''Alex''': Systematicity: Fodor and Pylyshyn vs the limits of transformers ''(P)'' <small>[https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/connectionism/ SEP], [https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.18654 Faith and Fate], [https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.00184 multiplication]</small>
* These were planned, but not presented at 2. Oct. Please also prepare for 9. oct, with a possibility that they will be presented at later dates. In case you do not plan to continue the course, please let me know and we will redistribute to other students:
* '''Ulrik''': Neurosymbolic AI after LLMs: LLMs with solvers and verifiers ''(P)'' <small>[https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.01817 LLM-Modulo], [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-023-06747-5 AlphaGeometry], [https://deepmind.google/discover/blog/ai-solves-imo-problems-at-silver-medal-level/ AlphaProof]</small>
** Rannar: Dennett: kvaalide kvainimine (quining qualia). Full text [https://web-archive.southampton.ac.uk/cogprints.org/254/ here]. About the views of Dennett [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/316513753_Illusionism_as_the_obvious_default_theory_of_consciousness by himself] and [https://www.thenewatlantis.com/publications/the-illusionist others]. Some [https://www.reddit.com/r/askphilosophy/comments/izbzhd/why_does_daniel_dennett_in_quining_qualia_assert/ discussion on reddit]. Wikipedia about [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qualia qualia].
* '''Ergo''': Alison Gopnik: LLMs as cultural technologies ''(P)'' <small>[https://simons.berkeley.edu/news/stone-soup-ai Stone soup AI], [https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adt9819 Science]</small>
** Roman: How do bacteria and simple organisms communicate. Start with this [https://www.ted.com/talks/bonnie_bassler_how_bacteria_talk?subtitle=en TED talk] and search for more. For example, [https://www.jstor.org/stable/24993610?seq=1 a SciAm article], [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/7275189_Keller_L_Surette_MG_Communication_in_bacteria_an_ecological_and_evolutionary_perspective_Nat_Rev_Microbiol_4_249-258 this] is an in-depth paper, [https://kids.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frym.2019.00001 this] handles bacteria working through insects.
** Marek: Frege: Frege tähendusest ja osutusest. Read [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sense_and_reference an overview/background from wikipedia] and Frege's own paper [https://www.jstor.org/stable/2181485 On Sense and Reference]. There is a [https://youtu.be/sDlFaOn71n8?si=dlhk_xJodh8vYnFz youtube video] about the paper. See SEP [https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/frege/ on Frege], [https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/frege-logic/ Frege's logic] and wikipedia about [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Begriffsschrift  Begriffsschrift] (the book inventing predicate calculus).
** Hanna: solipsism. Certainly consider several types of solipsism, starting from [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solipsism wiki]. See also [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Methodological_solipsism methodological solipsism] and [https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/methodological-individualism/ methodological individualism] in contrast to [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Externalism externalism] of Putnam etc
-->
* 16 okt
** Viktor: Frame problem. Good stuff to read, maybe in that order [https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/frame-problem/ SEP], [https://folk.idi.ntnu.no/gamback/teaching/TDT4138/dennett84.pdf Dennett], [https://people.cs.pitt.edu/~milos/courses/cs2740/Lectures/class14.pdf Blocks world example], [http://www-formal.stanford.edu/leora/fp.pdf Morgenstern]. Beware that none of the various "solutions" are not really satisfactory: they should be considered as possible approaches, not solutions.
** Lulof: Kant's [https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/kant-judgment/ theory of judgement].
** Enrico: statistical machine translation, incl major waves/paradigms of machine translation.


* 23 okt
== 20. November: thinking and AI: current AI ==
** Lulof: Wittgenstein's Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus vs Philosophical Investigations. Also: background and influences (like, for PI pragmatism via Ramsey). Tanel has done a very brief intro to the topic, so we can continue from there. I.e recall Tractatus, but do not spend much time there, assuming we have already looked into this. Spend more time on PI and especially the comparison between the Tractatus phase (early Wittgenstein) and PI phase (late Wittgenstein). This is a popular topic, easy to google.
** Enrico: Kripke semantics of modal logics. Also, check out the relevant materials from the section "Infinity, logic and philosophy of mathematics" above.
** Georg: Dennett: kvaalide kvainimine (quining qualia). Full text [https://web-archive.southampton.ac.uk/cogprints.org/254/ here]. About the views of Dennett [https://sites.tufts.edu/cogstud/dan-dennett-recent-work/ by himself] (search for e.g. "Welcome to Strong Illusionism") and [https://www.thenewatlantis.com/publications/the-illusionist others]. Some [https://www.reddit.com/r/askphilosophy/comments/izbzhd/why_does_daniel_dennett_in_quining_qualia_assert/ discussion on reddit]. Wikipedia about [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qualia qualia].
** Hannaliina: How do bacteria and simple organisms communicate. Start with this [https://www.ted.com/talks/bonnie_bassler_how_bacteria_talk?subtitle=en TED talk] and search for more. For example, [https://www.jstor.org/stable/24993610?seq=1 a SciAm article],  [https://serval.unil.ch/resource/serval:BIB_26B3AF6DB885.P001/REF.pdf this] (alternatively [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/7275189_Keller_L_Surette_MG_Communication_in_bacteria_an_ecological_and_evolutionary_perspective_Nat_Rev_Microbiol_4_249-258 here]) is an in-depth paper, [https://kids.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frym.2019.00001 this] handles bacteria working through insects.


* 30 okt
* '''Viktoria''': Chollet: "On the measure of intelligence" and the ARC benchmark ''(P)'' <small>[https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.01547 paper], [https://lexfridman.com/francois-chollet-2 Fridman], [https://arcprize.org/arc-agi ARC]</small>
** Lulof: About the paper "Computational irreducibility and compatibilism: towards a formalization". Free will issues connected to computation.
* '''Kristel''': Do LLMs build world models? LeCun vs the opposing claims ''(P)'' <small>[https://openreview.net/forum?id=BZ5a1r-kVsf LeCun], [https://lexfridman.com/yann-lecun-2 Fridman], [https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.13382 Othello-GPT]</small>
** Eleriin: Frege (first part of the presentation): Frege tähendusest ja osutusest. Read [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sense_and_reference an overview/background from wikipedia] and Frege's own paper [https://www.jstor.org/stable/2181485 On Sense and Reference]. There is a [https://youtu.be/sDlFaOn71n8?si=dlhk_xJodh8vYnFz youtube video] about the paper. See SEP [https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/frege/ on Frege], [https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/frege-logic/ Frege's logic] and wikipedia about [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Begriffsschrift  Begriffsschrift] (the book inventing predicate calculus).
* '''Anton''': Rodney Brooks on what transformers / LLMs can and cannot do ''(P)'' <small>[https://rodneybrooks.com/what-will-transformers-transform/ essay 1], [https://rodneybrooks.com/three-things-that-llms-have-made-us-rethink/ essay 2], [https://rodneybrooks.com/predictions-scorecard-2026-january-01/ scorecard]</small>
** Andres: solipsism. Certainly consider several types of solipsism, starting from [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solipsism wiki]. See also [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Methodological_solipsism methodological solipsism] and [https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/methodological-individualism/ methodological individualism] in contrast to [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Externalism externalism] of Putnam etc
* '''Yuliia''': Could a neuroscientist understand a microprocessor? <small>[https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005268 paper]</small>
* '''Annika''': Consciousness in AI: indicator properties (Butlin et al.) ''(P)'' <small>[https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.08708 paper]</small>
* '''Kati''': Computational irreducibility and compatibilism ''(P)'' <small>[https://arxiv.org/abs/2101.12033 paper], [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computational_irreducibility irreducibility], [https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/compatibilism/ SEP compatibilism]</small>
* '''Parviz''': AI existential risk: the main points of Yudkowsky and Soares, "If anyone builds it, everyone dies" (2025) ''(P)'' <small>[https://ifanyonebuildsit.com/ book], [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/If_Anyone_Builds_It,_Everyone_Dies wiki], [https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/uMQ3cqWDPHhjtiesc/agi-ruin-a-list-of-lethalities AGI Ruin]</small>
* '''Dimitrios''': Alignment faking and scheming in current LLMs: evidence for AI risk? ''(P)'' <small>[https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.14093 paper], [https://www.anthropic.com/research/alignment-faking summary], [https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.04984 scheming]</small>


* 6. November, biology/evolution focused themes:
== 27. November: semantics of natural language ==
** Eleriin: Frege: second part of the presentation (no biology here)
** Andres: Karl Friston and the free energy principle . A useful[https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2020/03/09/87-karl-friston-on-brains-predictions-and-free-energy/ podcast episode] and the [https://www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/~karl/ homepage].
** Viktoria: Antonio Damasio and the origin of important stuff in homeostasis. [https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2019/04/29/episode-44-antonio-damasio-on-feelings-thoughts-and-the-evolution-of-humanity/ Interview] and a [https://www.ted.com/speakers/antonio_damasio ted talk]. See also https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Somatic_marker_hypothesis
** Liisi: Donald D. Hoffman and the user interface (MUI) theory of mind. Easy to google, highly popular.


* '''Henry''': Vector semantics and the distributional hypothesis ''(P)'' <small>[https://web.stanford.edu/~jurafsky/slp3/5.pdf Jurafsky-Martin], [https://p.migdal.pl/blog/2017/01/king-man-woman-queen-why/ king - man + woman], [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Distributional_semantics wiki]</small>
* '''Kati''': Do LLMs understand meaning? Bender and Koller's octopus argument ''(P)'' <small>[https://aclanthology.org/2020.acl-main.463/ paper], [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stochastic_parrot stochastic parrot]</small>
* '''Ruslan''': "ChatGPT is bullshit": Frankfurt's concept of bullshit and LLM hallucinations ''(P)'' <small>[https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10676-024-09775-5 paper], [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/On_Bullshit Frankfurt], [https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.07484 machine bullshit]</small>
* Drops out: '''Juhan''': Semantics based on a world model ''(P)'' <small>[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Formal_semantics_(natural_language) wiki], [https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/model-theory/ SEP], [https://web.stanford.edu/~jurafsky/slp3/H.pdf Jurafsky-Martin]</small>
* '''Wessel''': Montague semantics ''(P)'' <small>[https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/montague-semantics/ SEP], [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Montague_grammar wiki]</small>
* '''Bauka''': Chomsky vs LLMs: the poverty of the stimulus debate today ''(P)'' <small>[https://lingbuzz.net/lingbuzz/007180 Piantadosi], [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poverty_of_the_stimulus wiki], [https://lexfridman.com/edward-gibson Gibson]</small>
* '''Valdur''': Semiotics and intelligent systems ''(P)'' <small>[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computational_semiotics wiki]</small>
* '''Markus''': Statistical machine translation and the paradigms of machine translation ''(P)'' <small>[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statistical_machine_translation SMT], [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_machine_translation history], [https://web.stanford.edu/~jurafsky/slp3/13.pdf Jurafsky-Martin]</small>


* 13. November, agency & extras:
== 4. December: dialog, pragmatics, uncertain knowledge ==
** Tanel will present the draft of agency questionnaire and we will discuss and improve it interactively.
** Danyil, moved from 30 Oct: Main points from Clark in the [https://samharris.org/episode/SEF4786499D Andy Clark] episode (predictive brain, embodied cognition, and the extended mind) full version from the [https://www.samharris.org/podcasts/making-sense-episodes Making sense] podcast by Sam Harris. If the full version link does not work for some reason, check out the shorter version [https://www.samharris.org/podcasts/making-sense-episodes/322-predicting-reality here] and ask Tanel for help. You may also want to google papers by Andy Clark and/or select for reading some papers from the [https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=JLYTMxgAAAAJ&hl=en&oi=ao scholar site] or [https://profiles.sussex.ac.uk/p493-andy-clark/publications his own site].
** Otto, moved from 6 Nov: Randy Gallistel on memory [https://braininspired.co/podcast/126/ interview 1] and maybe also [https://codykommers.substack.com/p/79-randy-gallistel#details interview 2]. Some additional background: [https://www.lifeiscomputation.com/the-truth-about-the-not-so-universal-approximation-theorem/ here]
** If we have time, Tanel will speak about various current AI philosophy themes and about the neurosymbolic reasoning research area.


* '''Viktoria''': Speech acts: Austin and Searle ''(P)'' <small>[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speech_act wiki], [https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/speech-acts/ SEP], [https://www.coursera.org/lecture/human-language/pragmatics-E8VXH lecture]</small>
* '''Ulrik''': Relevance theory ''(P)'' <small>[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relevance_theory wiki], [https://www.phon.ucl.ac.uk/publications/WPL/02papers/wilson_sperber.pdf Wilson, Sperber]</small>
* '''Valdur''': Peirce's semiotics and pragmatics ''(P)'' <small>[https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/peirce-semiotics/ SEP], [http://visual-memory.co.uk/daniel/Documents/S4B/ Semiotics for beginners]</small>
* '''Yuliia''': Ramsey's subjective probability theory <small>[http://fitelson.org/probability/ramsey.pdf Ramsey], [https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ramsey/#PartBeliSubjProb SEP]</small>
* '''Kalev''': Dialogue systems before LLMs ''(P)'' <small>[https://web.stanford.edu/~jurafsky/slp3/K.pdf Jurafsky-Martin], [https://soundcloud.com/nlp-highlights/89-dialog-systems-with-zhou-yu podcast]</small>
* '''Roman S.''': Deceiving with words: presupposition, lying and misleading ''(P)'' <small>[https://philosophybites.com/2015/03/jonathan-webber-on-deceiving-with-words/ podcast], [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CGJGIWqnSFY video], [https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/lying-definition/ SEP]</small>
* '''Mansoor''': LLM persuasion and manipulation ''(P)'' <small>[https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.09662 paper 1], [https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.14380 paper 2]</small>
* '''Kati''': Implicature experiments: do LLMs understand implicatures? ''(P)'' <small>[http://lingphil.mit.edu/papers/fox/class_1.pdf Fox], [https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.14986 paper], [https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/implicature/ SEP]</small>


* 20. November, continuing evolution
== 11. December: uncertain knowledge, causation, complexity ==
** Raul: Mike Frank: Early Language and Cognition. [https://braininspired.co/podcast/171/ Interview] and perhaps a longer [https://langcog.stanford.edu/papers_new/goodman-2016-tics.pdf paper 1] and [https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/yhrb4 paper 2]
** Kauri: Evolution of morals. alusta [http://www.spiegel.de/international/spiegel/spiegel-interview-with-edward-wilson-on-the-formation-of-morals-a-884767.html siit] ja otsi ise edasi. Vaata ka [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution_of_morality wiki põhiartiklit] ja [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Altruism_(biology) lähedalt seotud altruismi teemat]. Important background is [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sociobiology sociobiology] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolutionary_psychology evolutionary psychology].
** Jonatan: Anil Seth on consciousness.  A useful [https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2021/10/11/168-anil-seth-on-emergence-information-and-consciousness/ podcast episode] and a [https://www.anilseth.com/ homepage].
** Epp: Symbolic_interactionism https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/


* 27. November: complex systems and weird/radical worldviews
* '''Yuliia''': Interpretations of probability ''(P)'' <small>[https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/probability-interpret/ SEP], [[Numeric uncertainty|intro]]</small>
** Mihkel: David Krakauer about complex systems. See https://davidckrakauer.com/ and listen to https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2023/07/10/242-david-krakauer-on-complexity-agency-and-information/
* '''Wessel''': Logic and probability ''(P)'' <small>[https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/logic-probability/ SEP], [https://logictools.org/confer/ confidence]</small>
** Anzelika: panpsychism and Philip Goff. A useful [https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2019/11/04/71-philip-goff-on-consciousness-everywhere/ podcast episode]. Also, have a quick intro look into the “hard problem of consciousness” of Chalmers.
* '''Alex''': Probabilistic causation ''(P)'' <small>[https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/causation-probabilistic/ SEP]</small>
** Otto: Max Tegmark and the mathematical multiverse. A useful [https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2019/12/02/75-max-tegmark-on-reality-simulation-and-the-multiverse/ podcast episode].
* '''Kristel''': David Krakauer about complex systems ''(P)'' <small>[https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2023/07/10/242-david-krakauer-on-complexity-agency-and-information/ podcast], [https://davidckrakauer.com/ homepage]</small>
** Andres: Wolfram's theory of the world, using hypergraphs. A useful [https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2021/07/12/155-stephen-wolfram-on-computation-hypergraphs-and-fundamental-physics/ podcast] and [https://writings.stephenwolfram.com/2023/10/how-to-think-computationally-about-ai-the-universe-and-everything/ ted talk] and [https://writings.stephenwolfram.com/2020/04/finally-we-may-have-a-path-to-the-fundamental-theory-of-physics-and-its-beautiful/ some earlier writings]
* '''Denis''': Assembly theory <small>[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assembly_theory wiki], [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-023-06600-9 Nature], [https://www.samharris.org/podcasts/making-sense-episodes/388-what-is-life podcast]</small>
* '''Roman K.''': Wolfram's theory of the world using hypergraphs ''(P)'' <small>[https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2021/07/12/155-stephen-wolfram-on-computation-hypergraphs-and-fundamental-physics/ podcast], [https://writings.stephenwolfram.com/2020/04/finally-we-may-have-a-path-to-the-fundamental-theory-of-physics-and-its-beautiful/ Wolfram]</small>
* '''open theme''': Dummett: Truth <small>[https://www.andrew.cmu.edu/user/kk3n/epistclass/dummett.pdf text], [https://askaphilosopher.org/2017/03/04/michael-dummetts-truth/ comment]</small>
* '''open theme''': David Deutsch: explanation vs probability in scientific theories <small>[https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2023/10/16/253-david-deutsch-on-science-complexity-and-explanation/ podcast], [https://www.daviddeutsch.org.uk/papersarticles/ homepage]</small>
* ''free slots for moved talks''


* 4. December: more complexity, then probabilities, motivation, causation and friends
== 18. December: AI and the world, wrap-up ==
** Viktor: [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assembly_theory Assembly Theory]. See also [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-023-06600-9 a Nature paper]. Recommended: especially, a good [https://www.samharris.org/podcasts/making-sense-episodes/388-what-is-life discussion] with [https://www.santafe.edu/people/profile/sara-walker Sara Walker], and [https://lexfridman.com/lee-cronin-3/ another] with [https://www.santafe.edu/people/profile/leroy-lee-cronin Lee Cronin].
** Enrico: Kahneman & Tversky: briefly about Prospect theory and more on System 1 and System 2 thinking
** Lulof: Judea Pearl on causality. A useful [https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2022/05/09/196-judea-pearl-on-cause-and-effect/ podcast episode] and [https://lexfridman.com/judea-pearl another] and [https://www.samharris.org/podcasts/making-sense-episodes/164-cause-effect yet another] and [http://bayes.cs.ucla.edu/jp_home.html homepage].
** Otto: David Deutsch and the probabilistic (or rather, not) nature of scientific theories. A [https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2023/10/16/253-david-deutsch-on-science-complexity-and-explanation/ useful podcast]. Also the [https://www.daviddeutsch.org.uk/papersarticles/ homepage]. Here is one [https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rspa.2014.0540 complicated paper] on constructor theory, as a potential additional deep source.


* 11. December: reserve.  
* '''Roman K.''': The Platonic representation hypothesis: do all large models converge to the same picture of the world? ''(P)'' <small>[https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.07987 paper], [https://blog.jxmo.io/p/there-is-only-one-model blog], [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Problem_of_universals universals]</small>
** Probably some presentations planned for earlier will be moved here, for various reasons
* '''Dimitrios''': The technological singularity: Vinge (1993) and current views ''(P)'' <small>[https://mindstalk.net/vinge/vinge-sing.html Vinge], [https://ai-2027.com/ AI 2027], [https://knightcolumbia.org/content/ai-as-normal-technology normal technology]</small>
** Tanel will speak about several themes
* '''Anton''': Blaise Agüera y Arcas: what is intelligence? ''(P)'' <small>[https://whatisintelligence.antikythera.org/ book], [https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2024/08/19/286-blaise-aguera-y-arcas-on-the-emergence-of-replication-and-computation/ podcast]</small>
** The agency questionnaire: current state / results / etc
* '''Markus''': Peter Watts' "Blindsight": intelligence without consciousness ''(P)'' <small>[https://www.rifters.com/real/Blindsight.htm novel], [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blindsight_(Watts_novel) wiki]</small>
* '''Tanel''': wrap-up and exam overview


* 18. December: exam stuff
** Q&A about the exam
** We will quickly go over main exam materials, possible questions etc


= Initial ideas for the agency experiment =
<!--


[[Draft questionnaire for agency]]
time for 4 30-min presentation slots


Initial ideas:
18 Sept
-------


Agency /  Intelligence / consciousness / sentience
Erik: Putnam
Bauka: Dennet
Juhan: Wittgenstein
Teele: Frege
Pavel: Pragmatism


Agency measure: social question?? Let us make a questionnaire and ask students!
25 Sept
-------
4+2 pres:


facets/dimensions
Ulrich: Tarski
Wessel: Quine
Elina: Strawson
Dmitri: Paul Grice
Huzeifa: Homeostasis and brain science
Annika: Anil Seth consciousness


* more intelligent has more agency
2. Oct
* more money, then more agency
------
* more free, more agency
4+1 pres:
* physically strong
* ability is not the same as will (avoid free will issue)
* more facets??


comparisons for objects like
Alex: Philosophy of math
Roman: altruism and evolution of morals
Kristel: Randy Gallistel memory
Erik: Bacteria communicate
Hanna: Neurons are more complex...


* rocks/waterfall/earth/virus/bacteria/worm/dog/human/computer/clock/phone ... / country
9. Oct
* small rock / meteorite / flying rock
------
* different software kinds?
4+1 pres:
* short term / long term
* rock / sculpture
* effect of environment on people


What to do:
Parviz: Early language
Andreas: Hoffman user interface theory
Timofei: Andi Clark
Henri: Chomsky's theories of language.
Pavel: Solipsism


* google about agency discussions
* questionnaire suggestions


Important: sensible comparison items for different facets; also how to ask?
16. Oct
---------


[[Agency questionnaire draft development]]
Annabel: Nelson Goodman
Bauka: Kahneman system 1 and 2
Hanna: Are we living in a simulation (Bostrom)
Elina: Neuroimaging
Dmitri: Confirmation bias
Victoria: Mirror neurons
-->


= Some themes for selection =
= Some themes for selection =


Ideas for the first rounds [https://www.raamatukoi.ee/cgi-bin/raamat?1503 from this book] (search originals from the web):
Classical analytic philosophy
 
* Kant's [https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/kant-judgment/ theory of judgement].
* Wittgenstein's Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus vs Philosophical Investigations. Also: background and influences (like, for PI pragmatism via Ramsey). Tanel has done a very brief intro to the topic, so we can continue from there. I.e recall Tractatus, but do not spend much time there, assuming we have already looked into this. Spend more time on PI and especially the comparison between the Tractatus phase (early Wittgenstein) and PI phase (late Wittgenstein). This is a popular topic, easy to google.
* Putnam: tähendus ja osutus. [https://danielwharris.com/teaching/364online/weeks/3/Putnam.pdf Meaning and reference]. Lisaks tasub vaadata [https://faculty.washington.edu/smcohen/453/PutnamDisplay.pdf ülevaadet]. Vaata ka  [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_constructionism  Social_constructionism wikis] ja ntx [https://www.jstor.org/stable/2654557?seq=4 siin] ja taustaks kindlasti [https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/functionalism/ Functionalism (SEP)], [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Functionalism_(philosophy_of_mind) Functionalism (wiki)]: Googelda artiklile juurde seletusi/analüüse.
* Quine: empirismi kaks dogmat. Linke: [https://www.theologie.uzh.ch/dam/jcr:ffffffff-fbd6-1538-0000-000070cf64bc/Quine51.pdf siin], [https://sidoli.w.waseda.jp/Quine_Two_Dogmas.pdf siin]. Vt ka [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two_Dogmas_of_Empiricism taust/analüüs wikis].
* Frege: Frege tähendusest ja osutusest. Read [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sense_and_reference an overview/background from wikipedia] and Frege's own paper [https://www.jstor.org/stable/2181485 On Sense and Reference]. There is a [https://youtu.be/sDlFaOn71n8?si=dlhk_xJodh8vYnFz youtube video] about the paper. See SEP [https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/frege/ on Frege], [https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/frege-logic/ Frege's logic] and wikipedia about [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Begriffsschrift  Begriffsschrift] (the book inventing predicate calculus).
* Tarski: semantiline tõekontseptsioon. [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alfred_Tarski About Tarski]. The [https://sites.ualberta.ca/~francisp/Phil426/TarskiTruth1944.pdf original paper] and [https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/tarski-truth/ the SEP explanations/details/background]
* Strawson: tähendus ja tõde (meaning and truth). One [https://www.scribd.com/doc/101020068/Strawson-Meaning-and-Truth fulltext here]. Look at SEP about [https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/strawson/ Strawson]. There is a Robinson's podcast [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1XJ5k4GY83E video episode about the Strawson approach (at ca 1:21)] and another podcast [https://partiallyexaminedlife.com/2018/07/23/ep195-1-austin-strawson/ episode] about the context of Strawson/Austin debate on theme.
* Dennett: kvaalide kvainimine (quining qualia). Full text [https://web-archive.southampton.ac.uk/cogprints.org/254/ here]. About the views of Dennett [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/316513753_Illusionism_as_the_obvious_default_theory_of_consciousness by himself] and [https://www.thenewatlantis.com/publications/the-illusionist others]. Some [https://www.reddit.com/r/askphilosophy/comments/izbzhd/why_does_daniel_dennett_in_quining_qualia_assert/ discussion on reddit]. Wikipedia about [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qualia qualia].
* [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Dummett Dummett]: Truth. One fulltext [https://www.andrew.cmu.edu/user/kk3n/epistclass/dummett.pdf here]. You may also want to read comments like [https://askaphilosopher.org/2017/03/04/michael-dummetts-truth/ this] and background like [https://iep.utm.edu/scientific-realism-antirealism/ this]
* Pragmatism. Start with [https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/pragmatism/ the SEP article] and search for more.
* Paul Grice: "meaning" and overview of other important parts of Grice claims and theory. This is also so widely discussed that it is easy to google. Start with  [https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/grice/ SEP]. Some nice intros to implicatures: [https://www.bu.edu/linguistics/UG/course/lx502/_docs/lx502-implicatures.pdf here] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Implicature this wikipage]. [https://www.ucl.ac.uk/ls/studypacks/Grice-Logic.pdf Grice himself about this stuff]. [http://lingphil.mit.edu/papers/fox/class_1.pdf More detailed] stuff. Check also [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relevance_theory the relevance theory]. Certainly look through a very nice [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CGJGIWqnSFY video] about flouting/violating the maxims in relation to irony, sarcasm and jokes.


* Putnam: tähendus ja osutus. (Meaning and reference) 
Brain science and evolution
* Quine: empirismi kaks dogmat.  (Two dogmas of empiricism)
* Dummett: Truth.
* Tarski: semantiline tõekontseptsioon. 
* Strawson: tähendus ja tõde
* Ramsey subjektiivne tõenäosusteooria.


Further:
* Analytic / synthetic vs apriori / aposteriori (Kant etc)
* Frege: Frege tähendusest ja osutusest.
* Dennett: kvaalide kvainimine (quining qualia).
* Paul Grice: "meaning" and overview of other important parts of Grice claims and theory.
* Nick Boström "are we living in simulation".  http://www.simulation-argument.com/ and http://www.nickbostrom.com/ 
* Evolution of morals. [http://www.spiegel.de/international/spiegel/spiegel-interview-with-edward-wilson-on-the-formation-of-morals-a-884767.html alusta siit] ja otsi ise edasi.
* Chomsky keeleteooria põhipunktid
* Mirror Neurons mh alustuseks brain science podcast 35 Mirror Neurons ja podcast 39 (Discusses the role of mirror neurons in imitation and language) pluss googelda veidi juurde.
* Frame problem in AI. Start with http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frame_problem and continue to find additional materials and examples.
* How do bacteria and simple organisms communicate. Start with [http://www.ted.com/talks/bonnie_bassler_on_how_bacteria_communicate this TED lecture].
* infinity: cardinals and ordinals.
* Overview of pragmatism as a philosophical school: main ideas, development etc.
* example of a proof which is classically easy but intuitionistically hard: irrationality around square root of two.
* [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthropic_principle Anthropic principle] and the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boltzmann_brain Boltzmann brain]. 
* modal logics S4 ja S5 and possible worlds (Kripke semantics).
* neurons.
* Research and give an overview of the state of the art in machine translation: top systems, their capacity and the main principles of how they work.
* Statistical principles in machine translation a la Google
* Confirmation bias, start with [http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg21428661.200-the-argumentative-ape-why-were-wired-to-persuade.html?full=true this article]
* How do bacteria and simple organisms communicate. Start with [http://www.ted.com/talks/bonnie_bassler_on_how_bacteria_communicate this TED lecture]
* Evolution of morals. [http://www.spiegel.de/international/spiegel/spiegel-interview-with-edward-wilson-on-the-formation-of-morals-a-884767.html alusta siit]
*  How do bacteria and simple organisms communicate. Start with [http://www.ted.com/talks/bonnie_bassler_on_how_bacteria_communicate this TED lecture]
* Frame problem in AI. Start with http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frame_problem and continue to find additional materials and examples.
* Intuitsionistlik loogika: näited teoreemidest, mis kehtivad klassikaliselt, kuid mitte intuitsionistlikult. Näiteid tõestustest, millel lihtne klassikaline, kuid keeruline intuitsionistlik tõestus.
* Ordinaalid ja kardinaalid.
* Neuroimaging, auditory hallucinations, and the bicameral mind.pdf [http://www.reddit.com/r/Neuropsychology/comments/myznt/neuroimaging_auditory_hallucinations_and_the/ start here and download pdf]
* Neurons are more complex than we thought, see [https://www.quantamagazine.org/neural-dendrites-reveal-their-computational-power-20200114/ here] and [https://medium.com/intuitionmachine/neurons-are-more-complex-than-what-we-have-imagined-b3dd00a1dcd3 here] for starters.
* Neurons are more complex than we thought, see [https://www.quantamagazine.org/neural-dendrites-reveal-their-computational-power-20200114/ here] and [https://medium.com/intuitionmachine/neurons-are-more-complex-than-what-we-have-imagined-b3dd00a1dcd3 here] for starters.
* [https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005268 Could a Neuroscientist Understand a Microprocessor?]
* [https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005268 Could a Neuroscientist Understand a Microprocessor?]
* [https://qualiacomputing.com/2016/12/12/the-hyperbolic-geometry-of-dmt-experiences/ The Hyperbolic Geometry of DMT Experiences] and see [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lyu7v7nWzfo this] for some background.
* Karl Friston and the free energy principle . A useful[https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2020/03/09/87-karl-friston-on-brains-predictions-and-free-energy/ podcast episode] and the [https://www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/~karl/ homepage].
* [https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11245-017-9460-1 Perception Without Representation]
* Antonio Damasio and the origin of important stuff in homeostasis. [https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2019/04/29/episode-44-antonio-damasio-on-feelings-thoughts-and-the-evolution-of-humanity/ Interview] and a [https://www.ted.com/speakers/antonio_damasio ted talk]. See also https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Somatic_marker_hypothesis
* [https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnsys.2016.00095/full Brain Computation Is Organized via Power-of-Two-Based Permutation Logic]
* Donald D. Hoffman and the user interface (MUI) theory of mind. Easy to google, highly popular.
* Main points from Clark in the [https://samharris.org/episode/SEF4786499D Andy Clark] episode (predictive brain, embodied cognition, and the extended mind) full version from the [https://www.samharris.org/podcasts/making-sense-episodes Making sense] podcast by Sam Harris. If the full version link does not work for some reason, check out the shorter version [https://www.samharris.org/podcasts/making-sense-episodes/322-predicting-reality here] and ask Tanel for help. You may also want to google papers by Andy Clark and/or select for reading some papers from the [https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=JLYTMxgAAAAJ&hl=en&oi=ao scholar site] or [https://profiles.sussex.ac.uk/p493-andy-clark/publications his own site].
* Randy Gallistel on memory [https://braininspired.co/podcast/126/ interview 1] and maybe also [https://codykommers.substack.com/p/79-randy-gallistel#details interview 2]. Some additional background: [https://www.lifeiscomputation.com/the-truth-about-the-not-so-universal-approximation-theorem/ here]
* Confirmation bias, start with [https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg21428661-200-the-argumentative-ape-why-were-wired-to-persuade/ this article] and search for more. Vaata lisaks [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confirmation_bias wikist].
* Mike Frank: Early Language and Cognition. [https://braininspired.co/podcast/171/ Interview] and perhaps a longer [https://langcog.stanford.edu/papers_new/goodman-2016-tics.pdf paper 1] and [https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/yhrb4 paper 2]
* Evolution of morals. alusta [http://www.spiegel.de/international/spiegel/spiegel-interview-with-edward-wilson-on-the-formation-of-morals-a-884767.html siit] ja otsi ise edasi. Vaata ka [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution_of_morality wiki põhiartiklit] ja [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Altruism_(biology) lähedalt seotud altruismi teemat]. Important background is [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sociobiology sociobiology] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolutionary_psychology evolutionary psychology].
* Anil Seth on consciousness.  A useful [https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2021/10/11/168-anil-seth-on-emergence-information-and-consciousness/ podcast episode] and a [https://www.anilseth.com/ homepage].
* Symbolic_interactionism https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
* Main points of Chomsky's theories of language. This is so widely discussed that it is easy to google. You may want to listen to some podcasts with Chomsky himself: for example, [https://podbay.fm/p/robinsons-podcast/e/1679583620 this] and [https://lexfridman.com/noam-chomsky this]. Certainly read about criticism. You may want to listen to [https://lexfridman.com/edward-gibson this episode] with a critical analysis of Chomsky.
* How do bacteria and simple organisms communicate. Start with this [https://www.ted.com/talks/bonnie_bassler_how_bacteria_talk?subtitle=en TED talk] and search for more. For example, [https://www.jstor.org/stable/24993610?seq=1 a SciAm article], [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/7275189_Keller_L_Surette_MG_Communication_in_bacteria_an_ecological_and_evolutionary_perspective_Nat_Rev_Microbiol_4_249-258 this] is an in-depth paper, [https://kids.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frym.2019.00001 this] handles bacteria working through insects.
* Neuroimaging, auditory hallucinations, and the bicameral mind.pdf [http://www.reddit.com/r/Neuropsychology/comments/myznt/neuroimaging_auditory_hallucinations_and_the/ start here and download pdf]
* Mirror Neurons


<!--
Philosophy of math
== Toorik ajakavast: läheb korrigeerimisele / täpsustamisele ==
 
* Intuitsionistlik loogika: näited teoreemidest, mis kehtivad klassikaliselt, kuid mitte intuitsionistlikult. Näiteid tõestustest, millel lihtne klassikaline, kuid keeruline intuitsionistlik tõestus (standardnäide: ruutjuur kahest on irratsionaalne, vt näiteks [https://www.mathsisfun.com/numbers/square-root-2-irrational.html siit] ja googelda juurde). Vaata intuitsionisliku loogika kohta [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intuitionistic_logic wikist] ja [https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/logic-intuitionistic/ SEPist]. NB! Intuitsionistlik loogika on oluline teema matemaatika filosoofias: Tanel teeb sellele hilisemates loengutes eraldi sissejuhatuse.
* Infinity: Ordinaalid ja kardinaalid. Maybe start with a good exposition at [https://philosophy.stackexchange.com/questions/6352/what-is-the-difference-between-an-ordinal-number-and-a-cardinal-number  in this discussion]. Continue with [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cardinality cardinals] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ordinal_number ordinals] in wiki, check out [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russell%27s_paradox Russell's paradox], read about [https://people.maths.ox.ac.uk/knight/lectures/ordinals.pdf transfinite ordinals]
* Kripke semantics of modal logics. Also, check out the relevant materials from the section "Infinity, logic and philosophy of mathematics" above.
 
Specifically A.I.: in a narrow sense
 
* Frame problem. Good stuff to read, maybe in that order [https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/frame-problem/ SEP], [https://folk.idi.ntnu.no/gamback/teaching/TDT4138/dennett84.pdf Dennett], [https://people.cs.pitt.edu/~milos/courses/cs2740/Lectures/class14.pdf Blocks world example], [http://www-formal.stanford.edu/leora/fp.pdf Morgenstern]. Beware that none of the various "solutions" are not really satisfactory: they should be considered as possible approaches, not solutions.
* About the paper "Computational irreducibility and compatibilism: towards a formalization". Free will issues connected to computation.
* Statistical machine translation, incl major waves/paradigms of machine translation.
 
Complexity, probabilities, motivation, causation and friends
 
* Ramsey subjektiivne tõenäosusteooria. [http://fitelson.org/probability/ramsey.pdf Full text] of his paper. Important background: [https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/probability-interpret/ interpretations of probability], esp "The Subjective Interpretation" and [https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ramsey/#PartBeliSubjProb specifically about Ramsey's views].
* [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assembly_theory Assembly Theory]. See also [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-023-06600-9 a Nature paper]. Recommended: especially, a good [https://www.samharris.org/podcasts/making-sense-episodes/388-what-is-life discussion] with [https://www.santafe.edu/people/profile/sara-walker Sara Walker], and [https://lexfridman.com/lee-cronin-3/ another] with [https://www.santafe.edu/people/profile/leroy-lee-cronin Lee Cronin].
* Kahneman & Tversky: briefly about Prospect theory and more on System 1 and System 2 thinking
* Judea Pearl on causality. A useful [https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2022/05/09/196-judea-pearl-on-cause-and-effect/ podcast episode] and [https://lexfridman.com/judea-pearl another] and [https://www.samharris.org/podcasts/making-sense-episodes/164-cause-effect yet another] and [http://bayes.cs.ucla.edu/jp_home.html homepage].
*  David Deutsch and the probabilistic (or rather, not) nature of scientific theories. A [https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2023/10/16/253-david-deutsch-on-science-complexity-and-explanation/ useful podcast]. Also the [https://www.daviddeutsch.org.uk/papersarticles/ homepage]. Here is one [https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rspa.2014.0540 complicated paper] on constructor theory, as a potential additional deep source.


11. sept:
Various ideas about the world
Andres: Putnam: tähendus ja osutus. (Meaning and reference)
Georg: Nick Boström "are we living in simulation". http://www.simulation-argument.com/ and http://www.nickbostrom.com/
Hannaliina: Quine: empirismi kaks dogmat. (Two dogmas of empiricism)
Eleriin: Confirmation bias, start with this article
18. sept
Danyil: Evolution of morals. alusta siit ja o tsi ise edasi.
Viktoria: Strawson: tähendus ja tõde
Liisi: Intuitsionistlik loogika: näited teoreemidest, mis kehtivad klassikaliselt, kuid mitte intuitsionistlikult. Näiteid tõestustest, millel lihtne klassikaline, kuid keeruline intuitsionistlik tõestus.
Raul: Dummett: Truth.
25. sept
Kauri: Ramsey subjektiivne tõenäosusteooria.
Jonatan: antroopsusprintsiip
Rannar: Dennett: kvaalide kvainimine (quining qualia).
Roman: How do bacteria and simple organisms communicate


2 okt
* [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthropic_principle antroopsusprintsiip]. See the [https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/cosmology/#AnthReasMult take by SEP]. A good listen by a theoretical physicist [https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/tag/anthropic-principle/ is here]. You may want to have a look at the [https://anthropic-principle.com/anthropic-bias/ book] by Nick Boström, the classic [https://sseh.uchicago.edu/doc/Carter_Phil_Trans_1983.pdf full paper] by Brandon Carter, and [https://alta3b.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/The-Anthropic-Cosmological-Principle-John-Barrow.pdf the full book] by Barrow and Tipler. Related tidbit: there is a very early paper about the [https://www.digar.ee/arhiiv/nlib-digar:101387 anthropic principle in microcosmos] by Tanel, closely related to [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boltzmann_brain Boltzmann brain].
Marek: Frege: Frege tähendusest ja osutusest.
* Nick Boström [https://simulation-argument.com/ Are we living in simulation]. Vt taustaks [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nick_Bostrom Nick Boström (wiki)] ja [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simulation_hypothesis taust/analüüs wikis]. Googelda juurde veel analüüse/arvamusi/vastuväiteid.
Mihkel: pragmatism
* David Krakauer about complex systems. See https://davidckrakauer.com/ and listen to https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2023/07/10/242-david-krakauer-on-complexity-agency-and-information/
Epp: Tarski: semantiline tõekontseptsioon.
* panpsychism and Philip Goff. A useful [https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2019/11/04/71-philip-goff-on-consciousness-everywhere/ podcast episode]. Also, have a quick intro look into the "hard problem of consciousness" of Chalmers.
Hanna: solipsism
* Max Tegmark and the mathematical multiverse. A useful [https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2019/12/02/75-max-tegmark-on-reality-simulation-and-the-multiverse/ podcast episode].
9 okt
* Wolfram's theory of the world, using hypergraphs. A useful [https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2021/07/12/155-stephen-wolfram-on-computation-hypergraphs-and-fundamental-physics/ podcast] and [https://writings.stephenwolfram.com/2023/10/how-to-think-computationally-about-ai-the-universe-and-everything/ ted talk] and [https://writings.stephenwolfram.com/2020/04/finally-we-may-have-a-path-to-the-fundamental-theory-of-physics-and-its-beautiful/ some earlier writings]
Anzelika: infinity: Ordinaalid ja kardinaalid
* Solipsism. Certainly consider several types of solipsism, starting from [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solipsism wiki]. See also [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Methodological_solipsism methodological solipsism] and [https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/methodological-individualism/ methodological individualism] in contrast to [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Externalism externalism] of Putnam etc
-->

Viimane redaktsioon: 27. oktoober 2026, kell 22:20

märgid
märgid

Code: ITV9070
Link: http://lambda.ee/wiki/Semantika_ja_anal%C3%BC%C3%BCtiline_filosoofia
Title: Semantics and Analytical Philosophy
Archive: year 2025 archive
Lecturer: Tanel Tammet
Contact: tanel.tammet@ttu.ee, 6203457, ICT 426

"A sign is anything that can be used to tell a lie." --Umberto Eco

“I’m writing a book on magic,” I explain, and I’m asked, “Real magic?” By real magic people mean miracles, thaumaturgical acts, and supernatural powers. “No,” I answer: “Conjuring tricks, not real magic.” Real magic, in other words, refers to the magic that is not real, while the magic that is real, that can actually be done, is not real magic. --Lee Siegel


NB! Lambda server hardware has been fixed

Last week: sometimes the page did not open, sometimes it did.

Now the server is fixed.


Language: English and Estonian

The current plan is teach the course in English in 2026, unless everybody understands Estonian.

It is OK for students to give presentations, ask questions etc in Estonian as well.

The materials / information is currently a mix of English and Estonian: we will move towards mostly English information in case we will keep English as the main language of the course.

Teams and Recordings

Some recordings will be available, but we do not plan to record most lectures/seminars.

The teams group for the course is Semantika ja analüütiline filosoofia 2026. In rare cases when the seminar is on teams (first case: 18. September), not in the lecture room, we will use this. Please register, the team code is: cpjionc .

Use the link to the teams meeting on 18. Sept.

Time, place, credits

Time: Every Friday 09:30 - 11:45

Normally we will have student presentations during the lecture time, along with planning following presentations and brief intros by the lecturer. Location:

  • Normally: ICT-507 A/B
  • Sometimes: teams (these will be announced a week earlier)

Credits: 6

The lectures will be in English, unless everybody understands Estonian, in which case they will be in Estonian.

The presentations in practice sessions can be given in English or Estonian, as you prefer.

The contents of practice sessions are presentations by students and their discussion. For all students, presence in the practice sessions is important and is accounted for in the final grade.

We will probably succeed with saving the videos of lectures: will check out during the first weeks.

The course will finish with a written exam. The materials below marked with a red E will be critical for studying for the exam, while the materials marked with blue L are also used but less important. Materials without such marks will not be used for the exam questions.

In order to be allowed to take the exam, the initial plan is as follows (we may need to tune it):

  • each Ph.D student should give at least four presentations.
  • each master student should give at least two presentations. In case it turns out we will have enough time, an additional third short presentation might be asked for.

Presentations are not graded, but when they are determined not to be satfisfactory, they should be re-done.

The lecture times will be used for both

  • Short intros to thematic blocks by Tanel
  • Student presentations

NB! Presence at student presentations will be registered: failing to participate at many presentations will have a negative effect on the final grade.


Initial course plan, materials and topics

We consider several topics in the wider fields of semantics and analytic philosophy, like philosophy of language, mind and A.I., starting from general and classical ones and moving to more specific and modern.

The main goal of the lectures is to make it easier to understand the concepts and ideas in the topics, in order to better understand the reading materials.

Intro, semiotics and classical analytic philosophy

Core materials:

Useful to read/listen:

About the alphabet:


Notes on structuralism, deconstruction and friends:

Notes on Propp:

Notes on the Vienna circle and logical positivism:

Evolution of brain, intelligence and society

A highly recommended book: A Brief History of Intelligence: Evolution, AI, and the Five Breakthroughs That Made Our Brains

Sociobiology, evolutionary psychology and memetics.

Main material:

Recommended overviews:

Recommended books:

Important papers:

Additional notes and recommendations, not obligatory:

Brain science

Intro material

For exam:

Good general overviews:

Important podcasts:


General notes:

Read also:

Infinity, logic and philosophy of mathematics

The first topic is intro to the philosophy of mathematics, mainly the questions of infinity and unsolvability.

Materials to read:

Videos have heads down:

More about infinity and computability:

Helpful read: cardinality wikipedias. Read more about Gödel's incompleteness theorem from SEP: a part of a larger incompleteness-article.

A longer story about the philosophy of mathematics from SEP.

Nonclassical logics, related to the philosophy of mathematics:


More on nonclassical logics:

Thinking and AI

Notes for the overview talk

Classic ideas about the main questions of AI philosophy (close to the questions about functionalism):

First, a somewhat old interview with a classic:

Read the wiki pages of main issues:

Technical stuff from Graziano about neuroscience related to consciousness:

Detailed arguments and counterarguments for the

Some good core stuff


Living classics from the lex fridman podcast:


Semantics of natural language

We will look into both

  • Vector semantics
  • Semantics based on world model

Details will be added when the block starts

Dialog, pragmatics, uncertain knowledge

The first subject is dialogue pragmatics. Several related branches (have a brief look, but no need to read deeply unless you become interested):

To start, certainly look/listen these short lectures:

In case you just want to read original Grice:

Have a look at

Additionally, nice to listen and :


The next theme is uncertain information and probabilities: how to understand, write down and make conjectures.


Read this intro: Numeric uncertainty (L as explained next):

  • Certainly up the the section "Different ways to encode confidences in logic", also looking at the wikipages pointed to
  • Briefly look into the following sections, but do not focus or spend much time on these. The Numeric uncertainty intro was originally made for this course.

Then read the first parts and have brief looks at the SEP articles:

Here are some of our papers on our system, about confidence and reasoning with exceptions.


Recommended podcasts

  • The Gradient: a good AI podcast, relatively deep, several philosophical themes / episodes. Discontinued, but archives present.
  • Brain Inspired: real neuroscience with focus on AI related themes.
  • Philosophy bites: real philosophers conveying ideas rather clearly in ca 15 minutes
  • Robinsons podcast: Really good stuff with famous philosophers and related thinkers. One example: Donald Hoffman.
  • Making sense by Sam Harris sometimes does deep interviews with philosophers, like the following highly recommended Andy Clark episode (predictive brain, embodied cognition, and the extended mind) full version. If that does not work for some reason, check out the shorter version here.
  • Highly popular Lex Fridman podcast has sometimes deep interviews with AI and comp sci peaople. Specifically about AI I'd recommend some widely different views from Francois Chollet, Yann LeCun, Gary Marcus, Demis Hassabis, Ilya Sutskever, Ben Goertzel.
  • The Mindscape podcast of an important physicist has often quite philosophically interesting or cognitive science and AI interviews. Some recommendations: Blaise Agüera y Arcas, David Krakauer, Christoph Adami, Peter Godfrey-Smith, Yejin Choi, Hugo Mercier, Andrew Pontzen.

Presentation schedule

Time for each seminar: 09:30 - 11:45.

  • Until 9. October: normal-length talks, ca 25 min each.
  • From 16. October: short talks, 15 min each: 10 min talk and 5 min questions.
  • The seminars are overbooked, since some presenters cannot attend. If we run out of time, the remaining talks go first at the next seminar.
  • If you cannot attend, write to Tanel: your talk moves to a later seminar.
  • (P) marks a proposed theme. You may propose a different theme for the same date: write to Tanel.
  • The links after each talk are starting points. Search for more material yourself.

18. September (done)

25. September (done)

  • Wessel: Quine: two dogmas of empiricism text, wiki
  • Annika: Anil Seth on consciousness podcast
  • Ulrik: Tarski: the semantic conception of truth paper, SEP
  • Huzaifa: Homeostasis and brain science (Damasio) podcast
  • Dmitri: Paul Grice: meaning and implicature SEP, Grice

2. October (done)

  • Alex: Philosophy of mathematics: infinity and logic notes
  • Kristel: Randy Gallistel on memory podcast
  • Erik: How bacteria communicate TED

9. October

16. October

23. October: classical philosophy and semiotics, evolution, ideas about the world

30. October: logic and philosophy of mathematics

6. November: brain science and evolution

13. November: thinking and AI: classic arguments

20. November: thinking and AI: current AI

  • Viktoria: Chollet: "On the measure of intelligence" and the ARC benchmark (P) paper, Fridman, ARC
  • Kristel: Do LLMs build world models? LeCun vs the opposing claims (P) LeCun, Fridman, Othello-GPT
  • Anton: Rodney Brooks on what transformers / LLMs can and cannot do (P) essay 1, essay 2, scorecard
  • Yuliia: Could a neuroscientist understand a microprocessor? paper
  • Annika: Consciousness in AI: indicator properties (Butlin et al.) (P) paper
  • Kati: Computational irreducibility and compatibilism (P) paper, irreducibility, SEP compatibilism
  • Parviz: AI existential risk: the main points of Yudkowsky and Soares, "If anyone builds it, everyone dies" (2025) (P) book, wiki, AGI Ruin
  • Dimitrios: Alignment faking and scheming in current LLMs: evidence for AI risk? (P) paper, summary, scheming

27. November: semantics of natural language

4. December: dialog, pragmatics, uncertain knowledge

11. December: uncertain knowledge, causation, complexity

  • Yuliia: Interpretations of probability (P) SEP, intro
  • Wessel: Logic and probability (P) SEP, confidence
  • Alex: Probabilistic causation (P) SEP
  • Kristel: David Krakauer about complex systems (P) podcast, homepage
  • Denis: Assembly theory wiki, Nature, podcast
  • Roman K.: Wolfram's theory of the world using hypergraphs (P) podcast, Wolfram
  • open theme: Dummett: Truth text, comment
  • open theme: David Deutsch: explanation vs probability in scientific theories podcast, homepage
  • free slots for moved talks

18. December: AI and the world, wrap-up

  • Roman K.: The Platonic representation hypothesis: do all large models converge to the same picture of the world? (P) paper, blog, universals
  • Dimitrios: The technological singularity: Vinge (1993) and current views (P) Vinge, AI 2027, normal technology
  • Anton: Blaise Agüera y Arcas: what is intelligence? (P) book, podcast
  • Markus: Peter Watts' "Blindsight": intelligence without consciousness (P) novel, wiki
  • Tanel: wrap-up and exam overview


Some themes for selection

Classical analytic philosophy

Brain science and evolution

Philosophy of math

  • Intuitsionistlik loogika: näited teoreemidest, mis kehtivad klassikaliselt, kuid mitte intuitsionistlikult. Näiteid tõestustest, millel lihtne klassikaline, kuid keeruline intuitsionistlik tõestus (standardnäide: ruutjuur kahest on irratsionaalne, vt näiteks siit ja googelda juurde). Vaata intuitsionisliku loogika kohta wikist ja SEPist. NB! Intuitsionistlik loogika on oluline teema matemaatika filosoofias: Tanel teeb sellele hilisemates loengutes eraldi sissejuhatuse.
  • Infinity: Ordinaalid ja kardinaalid. Maybe start with a good exposition at in this discussion. Continue with cardinals and ordinals in wiki, check out Russell's paradox, read about transfinite ordinals
  • Kripke semantics of modal logics. Also, check out the relevant materials from the section "Infinity, logic and philosophy of mathematics" above.

Specifically A.I.: in a narrow sense

  • Frame problem. Good stuff to read, maybe in that order SEP, Dennett, Blocks world example, Morgenstern. Beware that none of the various "solutions" are not really satisfactory: they should be considered as possible approaches, not solutions.
  • About the paper "Computational irreducibility and compatibilism: towards a formalization". Free will issues connected to computation.
  • Statistical machine translation, incl major waves/paradigms of machine translation.

Complexity, probabilities, motivation, causation and friends

Various ideas about the world